[PCWorld]

Post your comments for 25 Moments From Our First 25 Years here

[Dewcrav3r]

I wish I could believe what you say about not having a bias in your product reviews, but I know better. Sure, a lot of your reviews are unbiased, but as of late I have been noticing some reports - especially online ones - are nothing more than a sales pitch or company propaganda. Let's go back to the good old days of unbiased news reports and reviews!

[publicmenace]

Hey McCracken, there's no "u" in "glamor". This isn't Canada, eh.

[mlrichardson]

Having read PCW from the first issue, I have to say I've not read too many magazines that stay closer to their claimed aim. A magazine that pays attention to the requirements of its readers! It's a phenomenon.
Keep up the good work.

[Name]

I have been thinking of NOT renewing my subscription to PC World: in recent times, there have been only a handful of
articles that I've found useful.
No doubt many readers enjoy all of the articles about cameras, HDTV,
etc., but I buy PC World for computer articles. If I want ratings of
HDTVs, I will look to sources such as Consumer Reports or specialty
magazines. I expect PC World to provide a magazine full of PC-related
articles. And while I recognize that cameras and HDTVs relate in some
ways to the use of a PC, it's not what I'm looking for when I read
PCW. Pperhaps I'll just skip the print edition.
Also, while the website "may" contain articles from past issues,
finding them is a challenge. I often remember an article weeks or
months after I've tossed the issue, but there is no easily accessible
archive in which I can page through old issues.

[Yert]

Aside from the rampant hate for Windows that seems to pop up (and probably because it sells), PC World is pretty darn good. Actually, the Windows hate isn't so bad, but its overplayed. Its one thing to say how to make it better, another to say it needs to be trashed.