|  RSS

PC World Forums: HP Photosmart C7280 MFP - PC World Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

HP Photosmart C7280 MFP

#1 User is offline   PCWorld Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 44,014
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 17 April 2008 - 10:30 AM

Post your comments for HP Photosmart C7280 MFP here
0

#2 User is offline   coastie65 Icon

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 10,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Richmond Va.

Posted 17 April 2008 - 04:33 PM

I have a C5180, which has pretty much everything this one does except FAX, including the six cartridges. I have been happy with it. These things are definately very versitile. The latest incarnation of this one is the C5280. I had looked at the C7180, but didn't really need the fax as I already have a combo Phone & Fax. In my opinion these are a very good series of all-in-ones. coastie65
0

#3 User is offline   spaul40 Icon

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 13-November 06

Posted 18 April 2008 - 11:17 AM

I bought a C7280 and installed it earlier this week. It is a real pleasure - easy to set up. The software that came with the unit wss a version of Rev 9. Rev 10.0.0 on the HP download site is much better (and resolves some issues that early users of the product noted. The only drawback is a 100 page sheet feeder and no dedicated slot for a #10 envelope (like the HP 6122).
0

#4 User is offline   coastie65 Icon

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 10,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Richmond Va.

Posted 18 April 2008 - 11:37 AM

Same with C5180, that lack of a dedicated slot for a #10 envelope is a bit of a hassle, but have managed pretty well just the same. coastie65
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users