EarthLink to Remove Philadelphia Wi-Fi
#2
Posted 13 May 2008 - 01:57 PM
Let's see, we have a city with a murder problem, yes someone is shot everyday, so they blame it on guns, (you know those inanimate objects that magically kill people by themselves) and hire a chief of police from D.C. who also had a murder problem in a city WHERE GUNS ARE OUTLAWED! HMM that makes sense.
We have a Casino revenue that will probably never see the light of day
Our former Mayor gave his brother a no bid contract at the airport, no impropriety here...OH and when the Fed's investigated him he cried the race card....But he had time to wait in line for his iPhone on the taxpayer dime....Philly is a sewer, and extremely corrupt...This is the best part..."The company offered to give the Philadelphia network to the city or the unnamed nonprofit for free, after which the nonprofit would offer free service, according to EarthLink. Representatives of the city and Wireless Philadelphia were not immediately available for comment."
Now why doesn't someone give me a FREE citywide wireless network?
I'll take it.........BTW who is Wireless Philadelphia a shakedown organization? Must be if EarthLink had to share revenue that obviously was not enough to make a profit on after that!
#3
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:36 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2008 - 07:31 PM
#6
Posted 15 May 2008 - 02:36 AM
The Contract signed by Earthlink representatives stated that subscribers would be charged $21.95 for this service and the charge would be cut in half for those that could not afford that. However, the fact is that:
A) if someone cannot afford $22 per month for a wireless service, what makes someone think they can even afford to have a laptop?
B) the majority of the service only worked in a small section of Philadelphia.
C) even when connected, the strength of the signal was never more than two or three bars out of five.
As a person who travels within Philadelphia quite frequently, this service would have been very convenient simply because I would never have to rely on either a hot spot or my own wifi connection; however, from even just checking availability within certain sections of Philadelphia, you could tell where the bulk of the infrastructure for this service resides. It is a shame that a major metropolitan like Philadelphia could not make this work, regardless of the ills that the city faces. I am sure another city will learn from what Philadelphia did right and wrong and make another attempt in the future.
On another note, while watching a new broadcast, I found out that three other cities pulled similar plans. However, no mention of the exact three cities.
#8
Posted 15 May 2008 - 03:41 AM
As I was doing some research on this, I found out that Chicago is doing something called WiMax. I did not dig deeper into that but, at the very least, the technology is there if done properly.
#9
Posted 15 May 2008 - 04:37 AM
#10
Posted 15 May 2008 - 06:46 AM
- Northeast Philadelphia had the strongest signals and the most access points set up
- Center City Philadelphia, the heart of Philly, ironically had the weakest signals and the fewest access points.
- South Philadelphia was scattered. The closer one was to Penns Landing, the better the signal. Also, the closer one was to sites such as the south Philadelphia movie theater had better signal strength.
- The remainder of the city was pretty much out of the loop. If I ever attempted to connect to any available wireless network outside of the areas listed, Wireless Philadelphia was not even listed.
Overall, outside of a few pockets of strong signals, I either saw no Wireless Philadelphia SSID or if it were there, it was very weak. I am by no means a networking expert; however, I would presume that the only way this would have work for all Philadelphia residents and visitors would be if there were access points set up to essentially blanket Philadelphia in a wireless network. I am not sure if that means setting up access points within 150 of each other or what but the initial planning definitely left out the vast majority of Philadelphia.
As RNR stated, there really wasn't any advertising or marketing at all. They did a blitz campaign back in 2005 but other than that, nothing.
#12
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:07 AM
I hope this doesn't go to waste as well. My fiancee works in City Hall and from what she hears, sees, and overhears, the city is not fighting very hard to keep this around. Shoot, the implementation of something like this would be unbelievable. Imagine sitting at home in Olde City writing a document that your boss needs and have the ability to print directly to the printer at your boss' office clear across the city on the Boulevard. The possibilities are endless.
#13
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:10 AM
#15
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:39 AM
#16
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:42 AM
My grand parents on my fathers side came from Italy, they did not run around with some Italian flag, speaking Italian, they spoke English (as bad as it was) at least they tried. Being part Native American it infuriates me to see these foreigners running around with their flags, speaking some foreign language. Hey if your country is so great, go back there please!
When I go to Lowes it pisses me off to see all the signs in Spanish, I am not in Mexico, and when I am in Mexico I don't care if you don't speak English, were in Mexico, speak Spanish all you want. Americans are such lame asses we do not even have an Official language..enough ranting ...sorry
#18
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:10 PM
http://abclocal.go.c...ocal&id=5923639
It is so sad. The mayor thinks that they can do better later (paraphrasing) and Councilman Rizzo (I think) wants the private sector to maintain something like this because, "...they do it best."
#19
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:35 PM
http://www.suntimes....chnology/945795,CST-FIN-wimax13.article
#20
Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:44 PM
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote