Memo to Microsoft: Enough With The Bribery
#2
Posted 01 December 2008 - 03:34 PM
#3
Posted 01 December 2008 - 04:39 PM
Note to Microsoft: It's about making money from the service, not giving money away!!
Me.just.can't.get.it: These people have decent products in some areas (consoles, smartphones, office suites e.t.c.) and also, a product that everybody will have to buy with every new computer, even if they don't add a single new feature in their new version.
However, they keep insisting -in a 10 year old's manner- to become competent in the search engine game, for no obvious reason or benefit whatsoever. Is it the prestige? (ms never quits... no wait, they have aleady quited the microsoft bob and the zune) Money? (nah... this msn search thing is sucking money like mad for it's development and not giving back, not to mention server and promotional costs) World domination syndrome? (no again... the place is run by a merchant)
It is just another case of a company:
1) Listening to their "analysts" too much
2) Having money to burn
3) Trying to push to the public a product that's sucks compared to some other that's already the defacto standard in people minds.
And yes... MSN is suckier. It's page is bloated, the search bar is a tiny thing at the top, the results aren't grouped ("show pages with similar results" anyone) e.t.c.
#4
Posted 01 December 2008 - 04:49 PM
The first one is the defacto in people's minds, the other one is the replica. And there is a reason: People at Wendy's, and MSN search, never bothered busting their behinds to come up with something new. They just looked for what they could easily snatch and copy from the competition. Did McDonalds opened a store in one location? You could tell that a Wendy's would open in the next corner a couple of month's later. Did Google decided to do search inside swf files, you will see MSN doing it some months later.
This may reduces the research and development and setting-up costs, but what they basically ended up with is the 'always second' runner that mimicks the gestures of first, never actually got the lead and never had any real fans...
#5
Posted 01 December 2008 - 04:53 PM
In the smartphone game, they added touch screens and a gui that made symbian look old. In the console wars, they came up with the first console to had builtin harddisk and internet connection.
They just do NOT WANT to innovate in the search engine game...
Anyway, selling code and devices is easier than selling internet services, so Microsoft should stick to that for it's own benefit
#6
Posted 01 December 2008 - 05:01 PM
#7
Posted 01 December 2008 - 06:26 PM
#8
Posted 02 December 2008 - 04:56 AM
Also, on a side note, the first console with a built in internet connection was actually the Sega Dreamcast. Technically the PS2 also had hard drive (it was an add on purchased seperately) but it also came out before the original X-Box. The X-Box was the first system to have a hard drive from the get go but it technically wasn't innovating.
#10
Posted 02 December 2008 - 12:43 PM
I think everyone should try it if you want to save some serious cash!!!
#11
Posted 02 December 2008 - 01:04 PM
#15
Posted 02 December 2008 - 01:40 PM
The Money's in the Bank!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#16
Posted 02 December 2008 - 01:47 PM
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

