XP Holdouts Remain a Hurdle for Windows 7
#2
Posted 12 January 2009 - 04:16 PM
#3
Posted 12 January 2009 - 04:28 PM
I understand MS's big push to simpler operating systems and maybe some folks out there like that. But Vista and W7 both have a cartoon elementary feel. They took simplicity and pushed it to the point of being "dumbed down".
#4
Posted 12 January 2009 - 05:29 PM
No more. That's it. We can't afford such serious disruption and heavy consulting and lost work time costs. Vista is painfully, painfully slooow, quirky, often illogical and it appears that Windows 7 will unbelievably not be the large improvement over Vista that is needs to be. Too bad. It's really sad to see such a great company self destruct like this.
#6
Posted 12 January 2009 - 08:24 PM
#7
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:40 PM
#8
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:00 AM
What Microsoft has released is a beta. In other words, the OS is still 'under construction'. As with any beta, I never come with the expectation that everything will be fully functional. Let's be realistic.
I would respectully suggest to those who are going to whine and complain instead of preparing an objectively written critique of the OS, please browse somewhere else.
There are many people who are looking forward to Windows 7 and its new features. So what if the OS still retains the Vista core. I feel there are many improvements in Windows 7 that Windows XP users will really enjoy and benefit from.
As for Linux, while I would agree that it has a number of really good things about it, I find it hard to believe someone would suggest that it is becoming more popular than Windows. In my own research, Linux is substantially more expensive to implement in the workplace. The city of Munich took more than 2 years to implement Linux and it became a nightmare with cost overuns. Windows 2003 Server could have solved their problems easily at less cost.
#9
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:19 AM
Some improvement over Vista is not enough. The flaws are so serious, in my organization's experience, that dramatic improvements are needed. You seem all too willing to accept the minimum. I and my staff just can't afford that. That's the reality. I wish it wasn't.
#10
Posted 13 January 2009 - 12:10 PM
i will continue to use XP until the support is totally done with. if m$ offers a 3-6 month trial run on win7, i might consider checking it out. but time will tell on a long run. m$ needs to stop deceiving consumers and move away from self-interest.
nuff said!
#11
Posted 13 January 2009 - 12:33 PM
#12
Posted 13 January 2009 - 01:17 PM
In any event, Windows is really about the unsophisticated 'masses' of people who just want a computer that 'works.' For many, XP has not really been that OS. As a participant of several computer 'help' forums, I am continually suprised by the number of people who really do not understand the fundamentals of XP even at this late stage of its life-cycle.
If W7 can provide the 'it just works' experience that many (most?) people want, then I am going to become familiar with it, and perhaps even install the stable version as my main OS.
I believe that linux (especially Ubuntu) is getting very close to providing a 'just works' OS for everyone, but it is not there yet, and needs some interface work to get there. Hey Ubuntu- how about a 'translation' version? It would offer windows-like versions of all the interface wording. the user could then 'click off' the translations when and if the new terminology was learned.
Operating Systems seem to be alot like religion for many, but at the end of the day it is just software. software should 'just work.'
perhaps W7 will be that software.
Hey Microsoft- Wanna make some extra cash? Put out a 'new' version of XP complete with integrated SP3, fixed bugs, and built-in recovery functions. Leave the UI alone, but offer some extra flashy 'skins' and 'themes' for it. Lots of XP die-hards would buy it all over again, including me. Bring on XT!
#13
Posted 13 January 2009 - 01:57 PM
What you are describing is Windows 7, in essence.
My current laptop will not be able to upgrade, but when Windows 7 is offered in sub-$1000 laptops, I will consider replacing my current laptop with a Windows 7 laptop. That way I will have both the OS and the hardware matched for optimum compatability. By that time, Windows 7 may be past SP1.
If Windows XP support goes away, I may have to bridge the gap to Windows 7, SP1 with Ubuntu Linux, which does run on my laptop.
#15
Posted 13 January 2009 - 09:08 PM
My USB devices swap so much better and are recognized, the entire operating system is so much smoother looking on LCD screens and we don't use Areo. I seem to be able to have 5-8 programs open and not take it down, some times FireFox stumbles on me and goes pale but it saves itself.
I am sure I won't be able to resist 7 when it comes out. I would beta it but I can't see having the patience for a 3 gig download.
I think the main problem here is people just got to settled in with XP since Microsoft let it live way to long - 7 years and counting or maybe hardware didn't advance fast enough to allow it.
I fully agree that you should stick with what works for you and if it's XP so be it. I know in my group no one moves on until they want to do something new that won't work as well on their current computer. I also know that I won't change back to XP, buy a Mac or install Linux just because someone says it's better when I know that what I have it working for me.
#16
Posted 13 January 2009 - 10:29 PM
#17
Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:29 AM
Win 7 uses 25.9GB of HDD space. Vista takes 23.4GB while XP takes 2.7GB.
What do you get in exchange? very little if anything imho. That's why XP will be around for a long time to come. XP is Classic Coke to Vista/Win 7 New Coke.
richeemxx, I agree 100% with your comments regarding the cartoonish feel to Vista and WIN 7.
#18
Posted 14 January 2009 - 01:27 PM
For me, using XP at this point isn't a very pleasant experience; it just feels so old and clunky. And it is, what, nearly nine years old now? A little long in the tooth, to say the least.
#19
Posted 14 January 2009 - 03:32 PM
#20
Posted 14 January 2009 - 03:42 PM
crzyallday0514 said:
It's not as if you're moving from Windows to a Unix-type OS, i.e., OS X, BSD, or Linux. Win7 is still Windows. It won't take long at all to pick up on the differences.
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

