Windows XP's Days are Really Numbered Now
#2
Posted 07 February 2009 - 01:16 PM
XP could be the indefinite OS. Just make the 'professional' edition the default one and configure security with user accounts BY DEFAULT, and it would work fine for years and be as secure as Shista.
Nope. Gotta make an incompatible new OS that won't run 'old' software, and release incompatible 'new' software for it so the users 'HAVE TO' pay to upgrade, or they can't run anything 'new' OR use any of their 'old' stuff.
#3
Posted 07 February 2009 - 01:53 PM
But... Vista may have been their worst idea since Win ME, and they really only have one chance to get it right after this since Linux is more user friendly than ever, and Apple is getting more affordable to what used to be the PC only market.
I've worked various tech support jobs since people had Win 95 and Win 98 for common OS's, and I've never heard as many general members of the public swearing they will never own another Windows PC since Vista was released.
Windows 7 better shine like a supernova or M$oft will start going down like the Titanic.
#4
Posted 07 February 2009 - 02:40 PM
#5
Posted 07 February 2009 - 03:04 PM
#6
Posted 07 February 2009 - 04:01 PM
Windows ever. I used Vista for a year,
hated it, removed it from my computer, and went back to XP - all my hardware
works flawlessly with XP and I couldn't be more pleased. Vista by any other name (Windows 7) is still Vista. I plan to stay with XP for a long, long time - support or no support! If, and when I can't use it, I will be moving to Linux or I will buy a Mac.
If Microsoft knew how to respect their customers' wishes, they would gladly support XP indefinitely.
#7
Posted 07 February 2009 - 04:18 PM
Apollo said:
It's been my experience that Microsoft never gladly supported XP. MCE is one prime example. It's a version that was released specifically to pawn off their responsibility to support XP. There have always been OEM versions of OS's as long as I can recall. Microsoft has never accepted the responsibility of supporting them. However, up until MCE there was always a Retail version that could be had. This was not true with MCE.
#8
Posted 07 February 2009 - 04:52 PM
#9
Posted 07 February 2009 - 08:44 PM
#10
Posted 08 February 2009 - 12:54 AM
#14
Posted 08 February 2009 - 11:19 AM
There's only one way that MS can force XP off most computers and that's to somehow find a way to accelerate the migration of programming to a pure 64 bit environment. Most copies of XP are of the 32-bit version of the OS, and if all mainstream windows software sold today became 64-bit only, users would be forced to upgrade to a 64-bit OS. Thankfully, there's no way for MS to realistically accomplish that feat. Businesses still heavily rely on 32-bit processing, and in this economic environment, nobody's going to completely overhaul their business environment just to please MS.
#15
Posted 08 February 2009 - 12:33 PM
As far as Linux goes its just going to be a open source community used for servers mostly and maybe on the desktop and not just small users either but as the whole computer market. Apple in the other hand as it is gaining marketshare be interests to see how people can deal with a simplified computer all in one because i personally wouldn't replace my desktop custom built gaming rig for a imac. As for notbooks and netops goes well good thing there are choices between windows linux and macbooks.
So i really don't see whats the fuss is all about. I left xp when i realized that these newer games are requiring more than 1gb of ram. 32 bit just doesn't cut it anymore. What ms should do is focus more on 64 bit and forget about 32 bit. Only problem i see if they do that people will come out of their caves and complain about why 32 bit is not being supported.
Wake up people this is 2009 and 32 should seriously go. I have left the 32 bit era one year ago and have not looked back at xp. I now keep xp on a virtual machine for tech support issues for those that are still on xp.
I am turning off email notification to this thread and i am going to go elsewhere pretty soon because pcworld is losing a lot of its credibility
#17
Posted 08 February 2009 - 12:54 PM
For most of the last year, I have been offering those who complain about this and that in Vista the opportunity to post the problems they were having with Vista on their machine. I had one who said I misunderstood, that he had wiped Vista off the HD in his new machine without ever booting it and installed XP. He actually admitted he had never used it. I had one post actual problems (Norton's Internet Security) with software not Vista, and no other responses. I do like your term for them.
Now that MS has announced the end of mainstream support for XP on April 14, which means after that date there will be 5 more years of free security updates, but no product improvement updates, we will start to see XP really disappear.
#19
Posted 09 February 2009 - 05:37 AM
#20
Posted 09 February 2009 - 06:55 AM
Problem is that never works, as evidenced by market share distribution over the last thirty years.
So every once in a while, they come up with more of the same, over-and-over again.
Annoying isn't it? I now look it philosophically: It's hilarious!
Bottom line reality is: There are NO (major) problems with Vista at all. With all due respects, 99.99% of the problems root cause is sitting between the chair and keyboard.
~~~~~~~~~~
Those who can, do; those who can't b!t@#!
~ Yet another WinTarded observation of a truth :^0
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

