rkinne01 said:
Again did you even read the article YOU posted? She didn't get $2.86 million, YOUR article stated that she ended up with less than $600,000. The attorney fees she had to pay were enormous and the medical bills likely were sizabale as well, she probably ended up with a small fraction of the settlement. The article says the coffee was at 180 Degrees, easily hot enough to cause serious injury.
Yes people die in car accidents everyday and lose body parts, but if the accident is a result of defective products or services they deserve justice and to be compensated. I would like to know how we can put a price on someone's body parts? How much is your thumb or leg worth to you?
I work with handicapped people and let me tell it isn't cheap to adapt to life with a disability. Artificial limbs are not cheap and can cost thousands of dollars, alterrations to homes cost even more, and this isn't even including medical expenses. Trust me $5,000 is nothing when your life is disrupted by a physcial limitation. I have seen many families bankrupted by even "minor" accidents.
Listen, I emphatize with all victims of wrongdoing.
In this case, I'm just saying the compensation for her own wrong doing was incommensurate with the 'tort' she claimed.
180 degrees Fahrenheit isn't 212 degrees, the boiling point of water. I'm more used to metric terminology, because it is rational, logical, predictable, and understandable. Linear in other words. Like 1 cm cube of water weighs one gram. Or the freezing point of water is zero degree Celcius, or boiling point is 100 degree Celcius... You know, some relationship, something simple that can be visualized, understood? Not this 32 degrees Fahrenheit freezing point nonsensical and illogical scale of measurement. {Fahrenheit is a temperature scale named after the German physicist Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit (1686?1736)}
I didn't say she got $2.86M. I said
the STUPID jury awarded that irresponsible amount. For one spilled cup of very very hot coffee. And not by McDonald's employees, or someone else, but by herself! Onto herself! Therefore, she bears most of the responsibility for causing that 'tort' to herself!
And as for the plaintiff's attorneys, they milked the system royally, by claiming the coffee was defective and dangerous!
And yes, you can get scalding burns from 80 degrees Celcius of any hot beverage or soup...
Now try to drink any hot beverage without caution, and see what happens. So what, someone else will sue for their
own careless wrongdoing? But to claim the coffee was dangerous is ludicrous! She is a danger to herself, and probably others. That is why it is called a 'dis-ability'. Sounds reason-able?
Yes I read the entire article, and many more... I'm a eBook worm. So?
Please google: Results 1 - 10 of about 141,000 for
most common drug addiction coffee. (0.22 seconds)
Quote
Caffeine Addiction - The most common stimulant on the market. The most common stimulant on the market today, Caffeine is used by 80-90% of Americans on a daily basis . Caffeine is found in coffee, tea, diet and regular sodas, ... By:Drug Addiction Couns Posted: Jan 19 2009 02:44:03 AM ...
therapistunlimited.com/index/Articles/Addictions/Caffeine+Addiction - 59k -
Okay, extrapolate a little: If 80-90% of Americans drink the stimulant drug caffeine on a daily basis, not to mention the rest of the world, let's be generous on thin safe side, assume only 1% of the world's population drinks a coffee once a day, that represents 60,000,000 cups per day. Multiply by 365 days in a year, thus 21,900,000,000 cups of hot coffee are consumed by the general population at-large. Just in one year, what are the statistical probabilities of someone getting burned? Well certainly more than that single unfortunate, accident prone lady. And how many get $600K tort awards for each burn? Now is that fair?
I'm saying judgements like this are obscene, and a travesty of justice. I didn't say the lady did not suffer. But fair is fair: She Did It To HERSELF.
That is the calamity with our so-called civilized society: Always point the finger at someone else:
"It wasn't my fault!"
"I didn't know the freshly brewed hot coffee was that hot..."
"I didn't know I had to pay for XP..."
:_|
I loathe gold-diggers, aka: These two ladies suing (plus the likes of Anna Nicole Smith), and all the lawyers parasites whose compensation is a direct percentage of whatever they can extort. Their motives? Greed. Follow the money! Certainly NOT JUSTICE.
PS: Have you noticed all the white-collar criminals are worse than vulgar random assault-and-battery? What's the latest scandal? $50 Billion lost? Or the case of WorldCom with $65 Billion lost? Or Nortel Networks, once the darlings of the stock markets, trading at $180 per share, now worth zero, and in bankruptcy? How many unfortunate people lost their entire life-savings and retirements with the like of those crooks?
And we get all this brouhaha about a mere less than $100 fee for XP? Whereas, I bet you that just the filing of this ludicrous lawsuit already cost more than $10K in lawyers' fees on both sides...
What a waste! Now imagine, if this money were used for altruistic purposes, like give it to somebody needy...
And If I had a mere million dollars in the bank, I could live off easily the rest of my entire life comfortably, without ever requiring touching the principal, just living off the interests... Then give the principal to my kids as a legacy.
~~~~~~~~~~
For a good life, follow the three R's
1) Respect of self
2) Respect of others
3)
Responsibility for all your actions
~ The Dalai Lama
There is no greater calamity than being consumed by greed.
{Chinese Proverb}