|  RSS

PC World Forums: Nasty New Worm Targets Home Routers, Cable Modems - PC World Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nasty New Worm Targets Home Routers, Cable Modems

#1 User is offline   PCWorld Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: PCWorld BOT
  • Posts: 44,292
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 25 March 2009 - 07:36 AM

Post your comments for Nasty New Worm Targets Home Routers, Cable Modems here
0

#2 User is offline   pj80226 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 25-March 09

Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:07 PM

Why are the 55 models not listed?
0

#3 User is offline   Envergure Icon

  • Full Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 30-December 08

Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:25 PM

I agree with PJ
0

#4 User is offline   grunjee Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-July 07

Posted 25 March 2009 - 01:27 PM

Probably because there are 55 of them...
0

#5 User is offline   SimonL Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 19-March 09

Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:36 AM

well, the 55 models of routers are, most of ones with programable interfaces, kinda most of the new models, as a point , beside changing the default password, try not to use something easy (like simple words, short string of consecutive numbers or same number repeated a few times only) and try to disable UPNP function on the router and the web acces to it.
0

#6 User is offline   publicmenace Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: 06-December 07

Posted 26 March 2009 - 08:30 AM

Thanks for the tips, SimonL. I opened my router's interface and found that I had "Remote Management" disabled but UPnP enabled, so I disabled that.
Trouble is, many ordinary users won't bother to do any of these steps or won't be able to figure out how to do them. Most people can't be bothered to apply secure configurations or best practices to their computer equipment because they feel it's too cumbersome, inconvenient or confusing to do so. Also, it's a fear of "breaking" something.
Thus, botnets are born.
0

#7 User is offline   AS440 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 26-March 09

Posted 26 March 2009 - 09:49 AM

After checking with Netgear technical telephone support, I was informed that Netgear routers (mine is a WGR614 v6) will not allow the user name to be changed from the manufacturer's default name "admin."
0

#8 User is offline   publicmenace Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: 06-December 07

Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:53 AM

"WGR614 v6) will not allow the user name to be changed from the manufacturer's default name "admin." That's cold. Make sure that you generate a really obscure password full of a combination of uppercase, lowercase and numeric characters.
0

#9 User is offline   ggand4 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 08-November 06

Posted 26 March 2009 - 02:44 PM

you're right, they didn't mention the 55 router brands but FYI.... here's the list of almost all the router brands... click here : http://www.mysimon.c...-11605_8-0.html
0

#10 User is offline   Kinman Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 115
  • Joined: 11-February 08

Posted 26 March 2009 - 07:24 PM

I have the same concern as public.
The remote access option in my router disabled (and no reason to enable it anyway, I don't need to access my router outside), but this worn can access the router anyway? In another word, this worn can access the private LAN from outside?
I like UPnP though, very convenient, don't need to forward ports manually. But I also like software like bitcomet that can take back the upnp setting when I close the program, so the setting won't stay forever.
0

#11 User is online   Scunnerous Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 18-April 07

Posted 26 March 2009 - 11:16 PM

Worth noting that all the devices which are vulnerable use the "mipsel" CPU, which is the MIPS32 chip, set for little endian mode. Those are usually an embedded design such as the Broadcom BCM5352 chipset used in many G routers. There's a whole family of Broadcom chipsets which are code compatible which is why there are so many affected devices.
0

#12 User is offline   SimonL Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 19-March 09

Posted 27 March 2009 - 02:11 AM

i think that , with web interface disable is good, is not enough, if the worm will attack LAN side, so that's why I suggested UPNP to disable, that's the programmable interface of the router, while an anti virus or firewall concerned, they realy don't block access to default gateway of the network (unless specified)and so your router might get hijacked to do the bidding of the botnet.

the real problem it arises only as traffic jam or busting the limit of your connection if you have one, and as mentioned, it can sniff the trafic from your network to internet and reverse for personal information
0

#13 User is offline   rss2 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 17-March 08

Posted 27 March 2009 - 04:13 AM

What does the UPNP / UPnP function or capability do?

Thanks,

Sandy
0

#14 User is offline   rss2 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 17-March 08

Posted 27 March 2009 - 03:10 PM

I was told today by a Senior Tech at Linksys that the worm arriving on April 1st does not have an effect on Upnp. I do not know whether it does or doesn't.
0

#15 User is offline   Marcomike Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 14-March 07

Posted 28 March 2009 - 06:51 AM

Ok,fine, you've told us about the routers, but what are the effects on DSL modems? and what models of Modems are affect?
0

#16 User is offline   SimonL Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 19-March 09

Posted 29 March 2009 - 03:19 AM

well 2 items on reply...

modems shouldn't be affected by the worm, as most of them have little to do them mere establish the dial-up connection, so modems should be safe

second, UPnP is the automated script interface that allows programs to set the necessary access through the router to the exterior (something like automatic setting up the firewall from router to receive incoming trafic) hence, this is one of the easier way for any type of trojan, virus, etc to assure incoming traffic from the internet, and so turning off this feature and enabling, for each and every application a firewall rule is safer not only in this case, but as a security feature overall (as well turning off the UPnP service in Microsoft ® Windows OS
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users