Six Editions of Windows 7: What's With All the Whining?
#61
Posted 14 June 2009 - 08:02 AM
#63
Posted 14 June 2009 - 08:44 AM
Guru could probably have built one for you as inexpensively as your manufactured machine, but then it would have taken his time. The key is how fast a processor and what bells and whistles do you want. Memory is almost a non decision now at current prices (4GB in two modules is $50 to $100). The most expensive component is the CPU/Motherboard combination based on speed and features on the MB. After that will generally be the Power Supply. This is an area where manufactured machines cut corners.
We had a recent post from a member about adding a graphics card to his machine. The problem is it has only a 300W power supply which was adequate for the machine as shipped with an integrated graphics chip. Adding the new card will mean an upgraded power supply. That same machine with a dedicated graphics card is shipped with a 350W Power Supply (I have a similar machine from the same mfg). I will not put less than a 500W in a build.
The only real criticism I have on manufactured machines is their tendency to load up the machines with all the promos, adds, download links and trial software. When I build a machine and set it up, it only has the trash can on the desktop. Of course it gets cluttered after that, but it's my clutter, not someone else's ads. On the business side those machines are shipped without the bloatware. But, they get paid to put the ads on which cuts the cost of the consumer machine a few dollars.
As I said, the big advantage of the manufactured machine is that everything is already in the box and covered by a warranty. Those of who build them, just prefer th fun of building our own. Sometimes we even take the guts out of a manufactured machine and put it in a new case - as I did recently as I wanted more access when I worked on the machine. Manufactured machines are designed to be assembled and shipped, and if all goes right, not be opened for years. That is good because it provides folks with good source for the product. Some people like to work on cars, some of us like to work on the computers. Thankfully we can all have what we need because of the diversity of the industry. It is actually easier to build machines now than it was in the '90's and the manufactured machines are far more diverse and much better as well.
#64
Posted 14 June 2009 - 11:25 AM
By-the-by...the Gateway is the ONLY computer I have ever purchased "off the shelf".... all the others including the very first one over 20 years ago have been built from scratch or custom ordered from an independent shop or Dell. I know many folks don't care for Dell, but my experience has been good...I get as close as I can on the basic powertrain and we go from there. If I have to spend a little money on an upgrade, that's OK..... to date, major mods have been software, not hardware..... there is more than one way of skinning a cat..... the biggest drawback I see with the Dell stuff I buy is the soundcard.... but I have all our music on HDD now and the computer is plumbed to an entertainment center, so no real biggie. As I said before, I am no power user!
#66
Posted 15 June 2009 - 05:42 AM
#67
Posted 15 June 2009 - 05:53 AM
That's why this whole discussion is so ridiculous. Did you know that there were five versions of XP? Did you know that there were 8 versions of Vista? No, most people were only aware of two or three on each.
#68
Posted 15 June 2009 - 06:46 AM
TheBigOldDog said:
Apparently you didn't read my earlier post. Not knowing anything about computer is no excuse. I didn't know much of anything about HDTVs before I went to the store and started looking over a few dozen different models. I did the research, ran comparisons, read reviews, etc., and made an informed decision, knowing full well what I was buying. You should be glad that you are given the option of saving money, because I guarantee you that a single version of Windows would make the licensing cost go up for everybody, meaning you'll lose money. Besides, Microsoft has clearly listed all major feature differences between the versions, so it would take you all of 5 minutes to look the list over and decide which one works best for you.
Here, I'll make this easy for you. Buy Windows 7 Home Premium. There, end of story. Just so you don't have to pay 'the guru', I will tell you that Home Premium will be the perfect edition for the vast majority of home users. If at any point in the future you discover you need one of the features of Professional, all you do is punch your credit card number into Windows Anytime Upgrade, and the missing features will be instantly unlocked. Windows XP didn't have the luxury of Anytime Upgrade, so upgrading from Home to Pro was a tedious and time-consuming process, so be glad it's been made so easy for you.
#69
Posted 15 June 2009 - 08:44 AM
Our "basic" machines work very well for our needs.... we put some of our dollars into a LAN rather than burn all of it on the boxes themselves.... we use one printer for 3 computers, the LAN has its own UPS, separate from that of the office box...the laps have their own batteries, so no UPS for them....we have a hybrid wired/wireless LAN that works quite well for our NEEDS...and we run good antivirus software on all three boxes, wireless router is encrypted to each specific lap, office box is wired, as is printer..... we try to pay attention to the important stuff, not bells and whistles....we do a good bit of work from the laps via remote desktop on office box....all boxes run XPPro.... we are to the point in life that we just want to git 'r done, not fiddle with stuff .... point and shoot, if you will.....and are quite happy with the current set-up...we have little interest in the latest, greatest whamma-jamma doo-dad...... I am comforted by the fact that we have a fairly sophisticated SYSTEM with comparatively few dollars invested..... a system that works well for us..... biggest complaint I have with our system is the ISP.... we use Roadrunner, and as much as I dislike Timewarner Cable, RR has worked very well for the almost 9 years we have had it.....EXCEPT, our node is grid-powered,when power goes out, so does RR.... to most this would not matter, but we have a stand-by power system, so I'm sitting here all dressed up with no place to go..... drives me crazy.... we will likely switch to DSL sooner than later and that should eliminate the problem except in very prolonged power outages.. and at the same time, we will go to satellite TV.... but changing the whole "system" -cable and ISP- over is something I dread!!!
#71
Posted 15 June 2009 - 10:31 AM
#72
Posted 15 June 2009 - 10:44 AM
#73
Posted 15 June 2009 - 11:16 AM
Are two versions too complicated?
Costs? Don't gimme BS about something that will cost around $200 (OEM brand-new) or $50 as an upgrade. Something that will be as critical as your OS for at least the next 3 years or so. Working out to a mere $0.18 per day for the next 3 years (24x7x365) x 3 ? ?? ???? ?:|
Whiners are cheapskates!
~~~~~~~~~~
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
~ Leonardo da Vinci, 1452-1519, Italian Painter and Sculptor
He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else.
~ Benjamin Franklin, 1706-1790, American Scientist/Publisher/Diplomat
If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude. Don't complain.
~ Maya Angelou
#74
Posted 15 June 2009 - 06:29 PM
#76
Posted 16 June 2009 - 12:22 AM
You have nothing positive to contribute and you continually trach talk MS and anyone that disagree's with you. You state nothing of fact, everything is merely your opinion.
Just be cool and quit insulting everyone and their opinions. You'll be hated much less......
#77
Posted 16 June 2009 - 01:07 AM
I mean, sure, you don't wanna hear that Microsoft is an abusive monopoly, that the U.S. federal court and court of appeals has found them to be a monopoly, and even split them up and forbade the pieces to cooperate, because they'd just crush everything and everyone in their path to world domination. Chopped 'em up like a hydra and more heads keep growing back.
Microsoft's CEO and his cronies thought they were untouchable. Their pompous display of disrespect of the law earned them no friends. Their shameless and relentless astroturfing leading up to (and during) the trial brought more district attorneys into the fight against them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UnitedStatesv._Microsoft
http://www.usdoj.gov...es/ms_index.htm
And Bill Gates is a lying weasel, too.
Quote
http://cyber.law.har...sdoj/trial.html
http://video.google....-8&sa=N&tab=wv#
Funny how old Billy Boy sounds just like Bill Clinton talking about his time spent with Monica Lewinski. "Define 'is'".
What's so hard about this concept?
Just admit they're an abusive monopoly as they have been found to be in multiple courts, in multiple nations.
They can keep appealing until doomsday in every nation they have been ruled against, like a rapist who doesn't like prison, but in the meantime they're still buggering the public all they can.
#78
Posted 16 June 2009 - 01:24 AM
#79
Posted 16 June 2009 - 02:13 AM
But that doesn't stop them from putting out good products. Why do you think they have that huge marketshare in the first place? Because people use their products. They all started from nothing and Microsoft came out on top.....way on top.
Tell me again how Microsoft is losing.
#80
Posted 16 June 2009 - 06:34 AM
Quote
>However, the appeals court did not overturn the findings of fact. The D.C. Circuit remanded the case for consideration of a proper remedy under a more limited scope of liability. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly was chosen to hear the case.
Not only was the remedy stricken, but when the case was remanded, Jackson was not permitted to hear it, a new Judge was chosen, quite a rebuke to the Judge. No the finding of fact was not altered, but the DOJ then simply went after a dollar penalty (always the dollar) so NO action was ever undertake to break Microsoft up.
Those who go back to the early days of Micro Computers when every machine had a separate OS and different versions of the software because of it, are actually thankful that we have benefited from the presence of Microsoft. The size of Microsoft has actually had the effect of lowering our costs, not increasing them. Even in the early days of IBM compatibles, you could not take a Microsoft PC-DOS disc from an IBM PC and boot any of the clones, but one - Compaq. You could not run the BasicA that came with PC-DOS on any machine other than IBM. But you could run the version of BasicA that came with Compaq on the IBM. The clones all ran MS-DOS and GWBasic, and if you wrote a Basic program sometimes it would run in one, but not the other.
Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

