Thanks,
Bill Ross

Anyway, ten isn't enough. I can think of ten for Facebook alone, first with seemingly allowing developers to create apps but not monitoring them. Therefore they get away with forcing people to spam their friends after they've taken 10 minutes to do a quiz that one of your other friends has spammed you with - you don't get the answer until you've harassed twenty of your mates. Application developers willingly encourage spam - for example, Dope Wars and Gang Wars offer you money in their games if you spam everyone's wall with their crap. Facebook claim to take the subject of developer spam seriously, yet they do nothing about it if you do point these things out.

And let's move onto the fact that Facebook also allow groups to be set up with any agenda - racism is the top one - and then completely fail to respond to complaints about them. The classic one is the Facebook group bringing to our attention Jewish (Zionist) leaders of the New World Order, which I'm sure Zuckerberg would be interested in if he wasn't conforming to the atrocious stereotypes that some of these groups put across - like, more interested in counting his money.

I dropped Facebook because of its spam, its contenders for the most friends (someone I know has over 800 people on his list), its dumb applications, its bad-by-default privacy policy and most of all, its movement outside of academia and company networks which allowed it to become just as bad as MySpace only in different ways. I prefer to rely on, oh, emails, phone calls and meeting people in the pub now.

the only ignorance are ie users who dis firefox users yet get more spyware through their browser by active x and other materials.

stupid ppl use old technology and only the dumbest of people use old technology from another company. ie8 is firefox 2.0. ie7 is firefox 1 just look at the engines they run on. firefox gets the new geko engines while ie gets the old. also for another test try ie8 on acid3 then try firefox 2 on it. even tho firefox 2 is a lot older it does better on it then beta ie8. firefox 3 scores a 71 which only opera and safari beats. now go to any secure site and see what they recommend most recommend firefox and opera not ie or safari. now add to the fact opera is only slightly more secure and the fact firefox can be tweaked to be even more secure and u have a guy blasting firefox for being too secure and too customizable.

so what this guy is saying is only the dumbest person wants the most secure browser that is also the most customizable. i couldve sworn it best to be most secure not least. am i missing something? =P

end users= dont like to be bothered by trivial things, love to be dif, love change , hate rules

now u gonna tell me im a geek when its u who cares about typing? because u would be in total denial if u believe that

youre gonne tell me ppl who like change and love to be dif would prefer a browser thats less customizable?

nerds/geeks use ie and the only end users who use ie are those who just use whats on the pc.

no person who hates rules would purposely choose ie, thats common sense

ie is only more popular because its orginally installed on the pc and MOST use what browser is installed on their pc and just update it. the others who actually speak highly of ie are nerds and geeks who love bill gates. most ppl who actually choose, choose firefox and its proven in countries where ie isnt install on their pc. firefox is more popular on pcs that ppl get to initially choose between. thats why in other countries firefox has more than 50% of the market share and if ie were so great and ppl didnt just use whats on their pc, firefox would be losing ground because it would be a "fad". but its not. once opera wins against microsoft, ull get to cry when firefox is most popular browser, because it already is for those who "CHOOSE" their browser rather then use what comes on their pc. (removed)