Quantcast
PC World
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
19 Replies Last post: Sep 13, 2008 1:31 PM by jnmayes   Branched from an earlier thread. 1 2 Previous Next
Click to view jnmayes's profile New Member 6 posts since
Jul 25, 2008
Reply

Jul 26, 2008 8:35 AM

Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f

The question on this advanced user (but novice pc builder) mind is how is this or another "build your own" better than an off the shelf system like the HP m9340f ($1029.99 at Best Buy)

Specs:
2.66 Intel Core 2 Quad
6GB DDR2 Memory
750GB Hard Drive
512MB NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Graphics Card
Gigabit Ethernet
802.11b/g/n Wireless
DVD-RW/CD-RW
TV Tuner
Media Card Reader
6 USB Ports
Media Center Remote
Vista Home Premium

Granted these may not be the best components. Also noise and bloatware are a factor. But are their ways to fix these flaws and still have a great PC without the hassle of building it yourself?

Feedback is welcome. I need a new desktop soon and have been weighing build vs buy for a while now. I don't play games but fast productivity and fast internet surfing are critical. Also do some light photo editing and maybe light video editing in the future.

Thanks for feedback.
Reply
Click to view mphenterprises's profile Member Moderators 9,119 posts since
Feb 19, 2007
1. Jul 26, 2008 8:38 AM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
Hi JNMayes and welcome to the PCWorld Communities. :D

The Discussion to which you have posted your concern is in relation to the news article. I have branched your issue into its own Discussion.


This is my personal Dream PC: http://forums.pcworld.com/blogs/mphenterprises/2007/12/21/my-gift-to-myself
Click to view lilxkid24's profile Old Hand 1,630 posts since
Jul 8, 2007
2. Jul 26, 2008 10:15 AM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
Building a computer is always cheaper than buying one from a manufacturer unless you have like a 50% discount coupon. Is there really a need for 6gigs of ram unless your really into hardcore photo editing and movie editing? The stats for HP is pretty good but the price is not. You can certainly build one for such a way cheaper price.


Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
Click to view rgreen4's profile Member Moderators 4,205 posts since
Oct 22, 2006
3. Jul 26, 2008 1:02 PM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
jnmayes - Welcome to the PC World Community. First let me point out as other regular members can confirm, I have a LOT of HP equipment. I have 2 HP laptops and an older HP Media Center and a 4 year old HP business class desktop, as well as several HP printers. With that said, I do not care for the m9xxx series of Media Center computers for the prinicipal fact that the glossy black case looks good but is one of several computer lines put out by HP and Dell that have the backwards cases.

The vast majority of cases open the left side panel to access the contents of the machine. The backwards or right sided cases open the right side panel to access the contents of the machine. This may seem a trivial thing, and it may be. The keyboard and mouse connections for example instead of being located immediately under the PSU are on the bottom edge of the back panel.

Fortunately, the MB is a standard MB, just rotated 180degrees to comply with the case setup.

Manufactured computers are always a compromise in what marketing types think will sell. They can be customized to a certain degree, if you order directly, and not on off a shelf at a store or website, for then you always get what is available.

Do you need 6GB of memory? I have 4 in my machine with Vista HP and it runs great. I have 2GB in my HP Media Center with Vista HP and it runs great.

Do you want a dial up modem?

Do you want cable card access for the TV tuner?

Doe you even want a TV tuner?

I would sit down and decide what I want on the computer, and then see how difficult it would be to buy the bits and pieces to put it together and how much it would cost.

The m9340f is a good buy, if it meets your needs. If you want to purchase a manufactured machine, then go to the HP website and see what it would cost to get exactly what you want. I personally lean more to the d5000 series more than the m9000 series, but then that's just me.


RGreensig2B
Click to view joewldcat's profile New Member 5 posts since
Jul 22, 2008
4. Jul 26, 2008 5:35 PM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
IMHO I would Build before Buying anyday for the simple fact when You have problems With it later down the line (in my experiance) it is usally easier to single out the Problem, and You get total control over what components are installed. Cooling is allways a factor, No matter What OEM computer You buy look forward to doing some upgrades to make it suit Your needs. For a $1029.00 You can Build a Pretty good Computer. Like You said You don't do any Gaming You could get a mid range video card like the 8600 GT and go with a Q6600 and a decent Motherboard like The ASUS P5K and the Antec Twelve Hundred, That would Be a good Start. But if Your not to good at Building computers or Just don't have Time Then I would Advise getting the Hp, I would go with the d5000 series as rgreen4 already Stated above.


Hope This Could Help! Good Luck!

Click to view alchav21's profile Member 167 posts since
Aug 5, 2007
5. Jul 28, 2008 5:54 PM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f

This is a good question, Build or Buy? Since you have never built one before, I would say Buy for you. There is a Learning Curve on building your own computers, and if you want to do it right, it's not cheaper. You want to put the best Hardware you can find, or it will come back and bit you. I always use SuperMicro MB's and all of them are still working going back to my Pentium III. So if you want to build your own, be ready to do a lot of research and you have to be a good Tech Person.

ALC

Click to view smax013's profile Old Hand 3,862 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
6. Jul 28, 2008 8:38 PM in response to: lilxkid24
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f

lilxkid24 wrote:Building a computer is always cheaper than buying one from a manufacturer unless you have like a 50% discount coupon. Is there really a need for 6gigs of ram unless your really into hardcore photo editing and movie editing? The stats for HP is pretty good but the price is not. You can certainly build one for such a way cheaper price.

Not always. At the lower end of the price scale, it starts to become difficult for home builders to compete with the economies of scale that the likes of HP or Dell can achieve. Keep in mind that they tend to buy things like motherboards, cases, processors, memory, PSUs, OSs, etc in bulk. As a result, a rather lower priced computer (in the $500 range) will likely be tough for a home builder to match pricewise as companies like Dell and HP can pay smaller amounts for the large number of commodity level parts that they use. Now, once you get into about the $1000 price range, it starts to be more and more true building a computer will be cheaper.




[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Old Hand 3,862 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
7. Jul 28, 2008 9:32 PM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f

jnmayes wrote:The question on this advanced user (but novice pc builder) mind is how is this or another "build your own" better than an off the shelf system like the HP m9340f ($1029.99 at Best Buy)

Specs:
2.66 Intel Core 2 Quad
6GB DDR2 Memory
750GB Hard Drive
512MB NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Graphics Card
Gigabit Ethernet
802.11b/g/n Wireless
DVD-RW/CD-RW
TV Tuner
Media Card Reader
6 USB Ports
Media Center Remote
Vista Home Premium

Granted these may not be the best components. Also noise and bloatware are a factor. But are their ways to fix these flaws and still have a great PC without the hassle of building it yourself?

Feedback is welcome. I need a new desktop soon and have been weighing build vs buy for a while now. I don't play games but fast productivity and fast internet surfing are critical. Also do some light photo editing and maybe light video editing in the future.

Thanks for feedback.

I will give a short version of my answer first...for me personally, I will never buy another brand name Windows desktop computer again...after building my first computer this past year, I now forever in the "built and they will come" camp...at least for my personal use. The only way I will end up with another name brand desktop computer is if I eventually buy a desktop Mac, Apple's lack of a mid level tower will likely stimy that for a while...iMac's don't appeal to me and while I would LOVE a Mac Pro, it would also be overkill for me and a waste of money. For any new Windows computer, it will be a computer I build myself.


This is primarily due to three reasons. The first is price. I don't personally see any value in bottom level priced computers. I generally fall in the mid to higher range level. As a result, it is generally cheaper for me to build it myself than buy a brand name. The second is flexibility and choice. When building a computer, it is MUCH easier for me to select the things that I want in it, not what some marketing smuck thinkgs might be good. I can compromise on the things that I don't really care too much about and "splurge" on those that I do care about...and end up with a computer that is more "me". The last is that in my experience support from the major computer manufacturers suck. While I don't typically need support (I usually can figure out and fix most of my problems on my own), I do place a premium on it...if it is part of the mix. I used to like Dell as their service and support was stellar. Not so much anymore. I had enough problems with my last Dell desktop that I will NEVER, EVER buy another Dell product again. While they were very good with most of the problems, they ducked BIG TIME an issue with one issue that in the grand scheme of things was relatively minor, but in the end their extremely crappy response on the issue has lost them a customer for life. And frankly, I consider that a good thing...with out them blowing me off, I would NOT have built a computer and found the freedom in that option.


But, that is me personally.


Factors that should help you decide are:

  • Price level. If you are looking in the bottom level price range (i.e. down in the $500 or so range), then you will find it difficult to build a computer cheaper than the likes of HP or Dell, etc. Once you get into the $1000 price range, you have a good chance to build a computer for less than buying...just remember to factor in the "unseen" prices into the "equation" (see the other points). In this vein, IF you assume specs you listed are EXACTLY what you want, then go price out the parts for building a computer that has a close specs as possible and see where the price comes out. I did a quick look at parts and using kind of "average" prices (not looking for deals or lowest prices or cheapest components), I priced the parts out at about $1100 plus or minus a $100 or $200. Thus, depending on the quality of parts you selected, building could be cheaper or more expensive. Note that is this does NOT account for the "cost" in your time to search for the parts, order the parts, and you time to actually build the computer. And it does not include shipping costs for the individual parts.
  • Choice/flexibility. If you want the ultimate in flexibility in component choice, then building is hard to beat. If you don't care, then buying name brand might be the way to go.
  • Support/experience level. If you have experience "tinkering" with the insides of a computer (things like installing new cards, installing new memory, installing new hard drives, etc), then building will not be that much harder...it is basically doing that kind of stuff with a little bit more (such as installing the motherboard and PSU in the case, installing the processor, etc). As such, building would be a good option. If you have NEVER cracked open a computer before, then buidling may not be the best choice. This is not to say that you could not do it or that you should not do it, but it does present some challenges. If you are downright "quesy" about open up a computer, then building a computer is not likely a good option. Then there is your tolerance and ability to figure out problems. If you have a problem, there is no central 1-800 number to call and hope THEY can figure out the problem...YOU are the 1-800 number. It will be largely up to YOU to figure out the problem. This is not to say you will be alone...there will be the individual component manufacturers that might provide some assistance and also the likes of the PCWorld community. But, you have to figure that it will be YOU that does the running around, search, asking, etc..
  • Fun factor. If all goes smoothly, then building a computer is rather fun and fulfilling experience and is much more "fun" than going to a store or a website and just buying something. OTOH, if it does NOT go well, then it can be a nightmare.
  • Instant gratification. If you need the computer ASAP and need it up and running ASAP, then buy a brand name computer and be done with it. While buidling a computer is not a super time intensive project, it is not anywhere near as fast a running down to the local Best Buy, picking up a new M9340f, bringing it home, taking it out of the box, plugging everything in, and firing it up.
  • Bloatware. As you noted, one big down side of brand name PCs is bloatware that they tend to ship with. There are ways to deal with that, to some degree, but tthey still tend to take time and effort. If you build a computer, no bloatware unless you miss the stuff and decide to install a bunch of crap yourself.;)* I will note that I believe some computer makers have been known to provide an option to pay a little more to have the bloatware left off the computer (the likes of HP and Dell, etc get paid by the software companies to include that crap...thus, they still want to get "paid", but it will be you doing the paying instead of the likes of some software company...think of it as something akin to a "protection racket"). There are also some utilities/webpages like PC Decrapifier. I have never used it myself, so I don't know how well it works.

Hope that helps some.


[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view rgreen4's profile Member Moderators 4,205 posts since
Oct 22, 2006
8. Jul 28, 2008 11:27 PM in response to: smax013
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
Smax - you hit just about all the bases that could be hit. Consider turning that into a document.

Jnmayes - I would add a few things. I use PC De-crapifier on the HP dv9500t laptop I bought directly from HP last fall. It does a fairly good job, it did not remove all of the crapware, and all but one of the items remaining were generally the "sign up to this internet site" type of icons easily dispatched with the delete comman. The one item was a trial of Norton's Internet Security which I ripped out by it's roots with the removal tool.

Starting about 20 years ago I built my own for about a decade, when time required and availability and cost factors swapped the decision. I bought my last desktop two years ago and since built two, one for me and one for a friend. Years ago, I could purchase the CPU, Memory and MB from the supplier and they would "integrate" them (read assemble) them for me so all I had to do was install the MB in the case, add the drives, install the OS and software and voila! I was done.

I was hesitant on the first one about installing the CPU and heatsink/fan, but reading posts in this community gave me the tools I needed. Now, I had a case and a DVD burner, and HD already, so now all I needed were the guts. I ordered the MB, Intel C2D E6750, 2GB of memory, Vista HP OEM DVD, and 8600GT video card for a total of $731. Add maybe a $80 for a case, $60 for a HD and $35 for a DVD Burner and it pushes $900, but if you paid todays prices you could knock $150 off of it for a total of about $750.

Following the instructions for the MB and the processor, I had no trouble assembling the CPU and heatsink onto the MB. From there it was familiar territory, as I have been know to completely disassemble a computer to give it a good cleaning to get all the dust out. After that one, I started assembling parts for one with an E4500 C2D for the friend and the total outlay was around $500. This time it used the onboard video as it was basically an internet machine for my friends daughter.

But you have to make the decision. PC De-Crapifier and Norton's Removal Tool can turn a manufactured machine into a nice desktop if you want to go that route.


RGreensig2B
Click to view joewldcat's profile New Member 5 posts since
Jul 22, 2008
10. Aug 29, 2008 9:24 AM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
Hello,

I would stick to the 32 bit because of all the driver and software compatibility issues. I have had both 32 and 64bit installed on this computer, and I could'nt really see any difference until it came time for heavy Photo/Video editing, extreme multitasking or intense gaming. So if you don't do any of those three I would stick to 32 bit because it is cheaper and it has a wider range of compatibility. IMHO I would not pay extra for an option I am not going to use.


Hope This helps!

Click to view joewldcat's profile New Member 5 posts since
Jul 22, 2008
12. Aug 30, 2008 7:28 AM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
As far as memory correct me if I'm wrong but Windows 32 bit only recognizes 3.5 GB but it will utilize the whole 8 Gb so There would be no significant performance Boost from Memory!
Click to view rgreen4's profile Member Moderators 4,205 posts since
Oct 22, 2006
13. Aug 30, 2008 9:43 AM in response to: jnmayes
Re: Which is Better - Building My Own Computer or Buying the HP m9340f
First of all, the 32 bit recognizes 4GB less the amount dedicated to video, CPU cache, etc. All hardware memory is deducted from the general memory when maxed out at 4GB. Thus, if you have a 512GB video card, the machine can use approximately 3.5GB, if you have a 1GB video card, the machine and use approximately 3GB.

I was going to reccommend that you go with 2 x 2GB, which would leave two slots open for future expansion, but I see that is not an option. I would agree that the 3GB option is not viable (2 x 1 GB + 2 x 512MB for those who have not looked), nor is the 4GB (4 x 1GB) for $50 more. The 6GB (2 x 2GB + 2 x 1GB) option for an additional $50 is a possibility, but I have to agree with you that the 8GB (4 x 2GB) for $200 over the base memory of 3GB is probably the best option. The memory would then all be matched factory installed and fully covered under the warranty.

For reference, on Newegg's website a 4GB (2 x 2GB) package of quality heat shielded DDR2 800 memory is around $90 a package. If you wanted, you could go with the 3GB and then for about $180 install memory with matching specs, yet high quality heat shielded memory. You could run the 3GB for a while and see how it performed. Then later if you wanted, you could boost the memory to either 6 (1 pkg ~ $90) or 8 (2 pkg ~ $180). Keep in mind that around December to January because of Christmas sales, memory may go up slightly. I would wait until you have the machine in hand to order the memory. Open the case, remove one module and order the same speed and CAS latency. I anticipate that the machine will come with DDR2-800, but the specifications indicate that it could come with DDR2-667. The CAS latency is usually little numbers like 4-4-4-12 or 5-5-5-12. Match them exactly. Here is a document with greater detail.

I have to quit looking at these systems, I keep drooling on the desktop. But if you have not already found it, here is the page with full MB specifications, drawing and photos of the layout.


RGreensig2B