Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.

This Question is Answered

32 Replies Last post: Nov 6, 2008 8:23 PM by dabigkahuna   Go to original post 1 2 3 Previous Next
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
17. Oct 23, 2008 6:42 PM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!

dabigkahuna wrote:
Problem with Office for the Mac is it doesn't handle the visual basic stuff I have in my existing documents. I haven't been able to find out of that Crossover Mac program will run those things or just limited to running the programs without those things. Might end up either just not using those things or might be what forces me to put Windows on the Mac (I hope not!).

Oh, I'm a retired teacher, but I still work a little part time at a local private school, thus my heavy usage of Excel especially for my rather complicated gradebook I made.
But then iWork does not Visual Basic either. And theoretically, Micro$oft has "seen the error of their ways" and will add Visual Basic support back in a future version of Office.


If you don't want to do that, then Crossover Mac should work. Office 2000 is listed as a "gold" application in terms of support ("silver" by their "advocates"...i.e. users). If Crossover does not work well, then either Boot Camp and/or Parallels/Fusion will certainly work...if you REALLY need to run Office with Visual Basic.


It is possible that some of the scripting that you have programmed in Visual Basic could be recreated in other ways depending on what it is that the scripting does. Granted, it would be "re-inventing the wheel" (i.e. having to do it again), but it would potentially mean not have to mess with ANYTHING Windoze related.


The point was that you can get Office for three computers for $130 and iWork for 5 computers of $80. Either should work well...assuming you can live without Visual Basic.

dabigkahuna wrote:
If I understand this correctly, the Time Capsule is exactly the same as the Airport Extreme $179 unit, but with the network hard drive (better quality HD?) which works with Time Machine.

For another$120, you get the 500 GB drive with Time Capsule.

Advantage: Less desk space than adding a separate drive. Better quality drive? Best bang for the buck? Set to work with Time Machine (is this ever an issue with other external drives?)

Disadvantage: Can't boot from it. So what happens if your internal drive messes up? And if Time Machine is making constant backups, if you got something defective or a virus is in the internal HD, wouldn't that just be copied to Time Capsule?

In short, yes...you understand correctly.


If you have a problem, you would boot from the "restore"/reinstall CD/DVD that came with the computer and reinstall the OS and then use Time Machine to reconnect to the Time Capsule and restore your "backup". Keep in mind that Time Machine kind does two "kinds" of back ups...it does an "overall" backup, but also does "versioning". The former can be thought of as your run of the mill "typical" type backup...backup everything. The latter means it backs up different versions of files and retains them. Time Machine by default is set to back up any changed files every hour. Thus, if you are working on let's say grade spreadsheet over a couple of days and you screw something up, you can "revert" to an older version...there will be multiple versions backed up and you can choose which one is best.


Time Machine can be a very valuable, powerful backup tool...but it does NOT do bootable backup clones. That is why I would suggest two parallel backup mentods...one is doing a Time Machine backup (whether to just a plain old external hard drive or to a Time Capsule, that you can decided separately) and the second is doing a full, bootable clone backup with the likes of SuperDuper. If you do a Time Machine backup, then Time Capsule has the advantage of being accessable wirelessly (or wired) over the network...in otherwords, you don't need to have an external hard drive hooked up to it all the time (thus, saving the use of a USB port).


As to viruses, yes, if a file is infected when it is backed up, then the backed up file will be infected. This is true of ANY backup method. The obvious key is to not backup infected files! ;) This is obviously easier to do when talking about a Mac as there are not a lot of viruses or malware for Macs as of yet.

dabigkahuna wrote:
Probably wouldn't have more than two or three (one after I get everything installed the way I want at first, then, later as I add more stuff, do it again. But once set, I would not want anything changing in it untless I specifically told it too.

Since you said you have to put a copy in a partition, that makes it seem that a different external drive would be better - divide it into three partitions (two for those basic clean backups and the rest for daily data changes and maybe some applications I don't put on the internal drive).

On the PC, I imagined ONLY backing up the partition containing the OS periodically like this and, if things got bad, put the ghost image most recent back in and then reinstalling the applications. A pain, but not taking nearly as much space - and probably able to put the images on DVD disks. I have the feeling with the mac with the single partition, I'd have to move the entire thing to the other HD which would be darn big and not able to put on a DVD setup.

You can certainly make multiple clones/images at different times of the system if it floats your boat. Not sure it makes sense other than to do a clone of everything installed (i.e. after all updates, applications installed, but no files copied over) that you put aside and then a second "active" "Smart" clone over EVERYTHING using SuperDuper's "Smart Clone" feature. But, you only really need to do the later if you combine it with a Time Machine backup. The Time Machine backup would largely be there to handle backup of files, but then you can update the Smart Clone when installing new applications or system patches.

dabigkahuna wrote:

So, with all that in mind, which approach (Airport Extreme vs Time Capsule) would you recommend and what is the best approach to making those clean copies I mentioned. Or am I being paranoid?

I didn't set this up on my present PC. I can go back and start over from the original disks, but with some of the updates since I bought it, I can't just use the original disks to make corrections except by starting from scratch before the service pack upgrades. I'd have to start over from scratch. I might do that once I have a new computer with everything I need on it, but I can't risk it now. Heck, I'm not even sure if I know where everything is now!

If you are inclinded to use Time Machine, then a Time Capsule can be useful with a laptop. If you do a desktop, then you will be more inclined to be willing to leave an external hard drive connected to it all the time (i.e. you are NOT going to move the computer). With a laptop, there are more possibilities that you might want to use the computer as a laptop (i.e. take it in front of the TV or into bed or to the kitchen table, etc)...and you could still maintain a connection to the Time Capsule for backup and general data storage even if wandering around the home with the laptop.


Ultimately, it is a choice only really you can make. You know how you work and live.

dabigkahuna wrote:

On the mac, I know some don't use software protection, but I think that may be an unnecessary risk. What do you use? Don't want to bog down my system and get those messages so much that says this or that is trying to do something and it is so hard to tell whether to approve or deny.

For anti-virus, I use Intego's VirusBarrier. And for a firewall, I use Intego's NetBarrier. Mac OS X has a fairly good built in firewall.





[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
20. Oct 24, 2008 5:39 AM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!

dabigkahuna wrote:
Yeah, but the iWork thing is something I thought I'd play with and see how much I could get out of it. I used to do that on PCs all the time, making things happen that most people said couldn't be done. I'm slow about it, but I've often succeeded. And it is a fun challenge.

But for some years, I simply already had what I needed an no motivation to find new solutions. With a Mac, it would be nice to do more on it, without microsoft if I can. Might just have to go without visual basic. The excel gradebook code just automates a few things and I can do without if necessary.

The Access project was pretty darn complicated, but what it was for, I no longer use now. Could change, but I'm thinking about Filemaker Pro and see what I can do with that. In short, I see it as being a "fun" challenge I've missed (I hope!). There is some geekiness to me!

iWork for 5 is $80??? I thought that was the single license and the 5 computers was $100.


I may get Office Mac. But if crossover does it, that's a pretty cheap alternative and it will run other stuff.


You're right...I had a brain crap...$100 for the family pack...$80 for the single...although you can get it for slightly less from Amazon, I believe.

dabigkahuna wrote:
Yeah, but the iWork thing is something I thought I'd play with and see how much I could get out of it. I used to do that on PCs all the time, making things happen that most people said couldn't be done. I'm slow about it, but I've often succeeded. And it is a fun challenge.

But for some years, I simply already had what I needed an no motivation to find new solutions. With a Mac, it would be nice to do more on it, without microsoft if I can. Might just have to go without visual basic. The excel gradebook code just automates a few things and I can do without if necessary.

The Access project was pretty darn complicated, but what it was for, I no longer use now. Could change, but I'm thinking about Filemaker Pro and see what I can do with that. In short, I see it as being a "fun" challenge I've missed (I hope!). There is some geekiness to me!

iWork for 5 is $80??? I thought that was the single license and the 5 computers was $100.


I may get Office Mac. But if crossover does it, that's a pretty cheap alternative and it will run other stuff.

I guess it is probably best to go with Time Capsule to start. But tell me, is it possible to, after getting everything on the MB updated and the initial applications installed, to use that drive to ALSO create backup of all that which would not be "updated" as part of the time machine process (or superduper)? Or is that only possible on a separate, external HD? I know it wouldn't be bootable - I'd just want to be able to use it to replace what is on the internal drive if things got to be a problem like they are on my PC. Might never use it, but I kinda like having something like this.

And is Time Capsule just for backing up stuff, or can you put programs on it?

You can use Time Capsule as a plain old regular network hard drive if you want (i.e. to store files and such). You might be able to run some programs from it, but many programs still must have "crap" loaded on the hard drive of the actual computer. And even if you use it as a Time Machine destniation, you can still use Time Capsule as a plain old network drive.


I have never played with SuperDuper OTHER than cloning to an external drive...so I don't know if you can make "image" files off to a drive or optical disks. If I get a chance, I will play with it to see. You can create a disk image using a built in Apple utility, but I don't know if it will work on the drive you have booted from...never tried it for that. I have no doubt that there is some third party app that can make drive image files...but don't know of one off hand for the Mac.

dabigkahuna wrote:

Oh, since you have worked with Macs so much, does the OS seem to bog down over time? My PC is something like 4.5 years old. All the updates are on it, but I've never stripped it down and started over. I'm tired of things seeming to hang-up from time to time and waiting until it let me do things again. I've read others talk about Windows needed to sometimes be reinstalled (another reason for the ghost image), but don't know about the Mac OS.
My Mac OS computers don't "bog down"...at least not like my Windoze computers do...but then I do tend to use my Windoze computers MUCH more than my Mac (forced to due to how I make my living). But, then I haven't re-installed Windoze on my currently main use Dell tower except for about three years ago when the hard drive bit the dust and I had to replace it. It has reached the point where a reinstall likely would be good...which I will do when I finally get off my tushie and switch over to my new computer build completely (been procrastinating on the switch for about a year).

dabigkahuna wrote:

I guess the bootable clone is something I would add later - at least if I got time capsule. Just to keep the initial cost down! Then add another drive later.

Laptop or desktop, the computer isn't likely to move much! My whole apt is only about 525 sq ft! The is no kitchen table!


Any reason you use NetBarrier rather than the built in firewall?

I use NetBarrier because I started using it BEFORE the Mac OS had a firewall built in, so I am kind of used to it. And the built in firewall was not too customizable initially...it has gotten better. I actually do use the built in firewall on my old G4 tower (my MacBook Pro is the one with the NetBarrier installed on it).


[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
22. Oct 25, 2008 10:03 AM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!

dabigkahuna wrote:
I'm not sure what the powers or limitations are of a "plain old regular network hard drive" :D

I just know about drives that are either built in or normal drives attached to a computer. In those cases, I know I can save files and install programs, make all kinds of partitions.

When I say "plain old regular network hard drive" that is to differentiate from the Time Machine capability. I basically mean that it can operate as a standard network drive that mounts on ANY computer on your network (both Windoze and Mac for sure...not completely sure about a Linux box) for general file storage and disk use. Basically, you would be able to use it just like an external drive or flash drive or floppy disk in copying files and storing files. It is basically like setting up file sharing from a computer except you don't have to leave a computer on for it...basically, like a computer file server with out it being a computer. You might be able to have partitions (I don't recall if you can set up multiple partitions or not)...but if you do, you DO NOT format it like you would an external (or internal) drive. And you can use it as a boot device....it is NOT a "dedicated" drive for just one computer.

dabigkahuna wrote:
You say I "may" be able to run programs from it. Does that mean you aren't sure or just that some programs may work and others may not? I guess having some parts of a program still put on the main drive is okay - I'm certainly used to that with a PC!
Both. In general, you can run Mac programs from any location on any drive on the Mac...and you can move applications AFTER installation...both of which is something that is not necessarily true on Windoze (some programs in Windoze HAVE to be installed in a certain location...and if you move the program file after you install in Windoze, many times it will not work properly). In theory, this should be true of a program moved to the Time Capsule drive (or any network drive), but it is possible that could cause problems. I am assuming that in general it will be that you would be able to run programs from the Time Capsule, but that there might be some that would not work just due to how they operate and such...but then it is possible that I could be off base. Note that if I am right and you can run programs of the network drive, then there might be some "lag" in how they run if they are disk intensive programs (i.e. database program or such).

dabigkahuna wrote:
Something I'm curious about. I mentioned in a prior post a couple programs I found which supposedly let you use extra buttons on mice which the mouse software themselves didn't provide (on a Mac). I don't mind experimenting with these things myself (and reporting back, of course). I could, for example, try my present keyboard and mouse and see if the software worked.

My concern is about if putting such things on my computer (maybe taking them off later) is if I'm going to be leaving "stuff" behind. PCs can be a hassle with this - one of the reasons I wanted ghost images on the PC. I figured I could make a number of changes, keeping track of what since the last image, and then at a future point decide which I really wanted to keep. Then use a prior ghost image followed by just adding the things I decided to keep followed by a new ghost image.

Looking at approximately two weeks to a new Mac!

Depends on how the mouse utility (or whatever) is written. If is somewhat "Windoze like" and sprinkles crap all over the place, then there might be some "crap" that sticks around....but even then, it will not likely be like Windoze since the Mac OS does not have something that is directly like the Registry in Windoze. Left over "residue" in the Registry is where a lot of Windoze "crud" builds up. But then you can also just get "file crud" building up from orphaned files from removed programs...and this can happen on a Mac as well depending on how the program is written.



[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
24. Oct 27, 2008 2:49 AM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!

dabigkahuna wrote:
Okay, so the hard drive in Time Capsule can be used from any machine on the network, using it as a network drive. So time machine just does some of this backup stuff automatically for Macs on the network? Oh, can you specify for it to NOT copy some things - or once it copies it once, tell it not to update it again unless you want to? Maybe by setting certain folders to copy or not copy?

I believe you can set aside folders/locations to NOT backup, but I don't know for sure...I have not upgraded to Leopard on my MacBook Pro, so I have not really played with Time Machine too much (did some very basic "playing" with it on my mom's MacBook which has Leopard). In many ways Time Machine is rather powerful, but in others it is VERY limiting.

dabigkahuna wrote:

You said it could be used as a boot device, but I thought you said before you couldn't boot from it. I think I missed something!

If I did, I had a brain cramp which resulted from my fingers being faster than my brain...you CANNOT boot from a network drive (at least not to my knowledge) and that includes Time Capsule. I likely forgot a "not" in my previous post.

dabigkahuna wrote:
On some forum (I forget which) someone mentioned the local store did memory upgrades AND gave them back the original memory. I asked about that and found something new. They said they don't give the memory back on their "rebate" for memory. Never heard of that rebate so I asked further. Seems their normal price for that memory is $300! I don't know if it is an instant rebate you don't have to even think about or one you apply for, but it was new to me.

Have to think a little about whether I should get it now while prices are low ($135 for educators) or just figure if I ever do need it, I can buy it for around the lower price from non-apple sources.

If you do decide to upgrade the memory yourself, be a little careful with where you buy the memory. Apple tends to use "better" specification memory, which on occasion can mean that getting any old cheap, generic memory might cause problems. I would suggest that if you buy and upgrade the memory yourself, buy it from a vendor that has tested the memory with Macs (Crucial.com and OWC are two good places to get memory for Macs). This is not to say that other memory will not work, but Macs can be a little finicky about memory.


[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
26. Oct 27, 2008 2:43 PM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!

I will be able to play with Time Machine some tonight at my folks' place. I will see what I can learn.


More than likely the issue with the microwave is ONLY when the microwave is in use...and it will be one of two things...


The one thing that is generally a problem is interference with the WiFi signal...microwaves can interfere with WiFi. The other possibilitiy might be some sort of magnetic field that could screw with a hard drive...but I am guessing that is MUCH less of an issue and only if rather close. It is most likely the potential WiFi interference issue.


[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 6,494 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
28. Oct 28, 2008 10:46 AM in response to: dabigkahuna
Re: Decision time!
I did confirm that Time Machine has an "exclusion" option...i.e. you can set aside certain things to NOT backup.


[soapbox] Backup = good...No backup = bad!! [/soap box]

Visit other IDG sites: