Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.

This Question is Possibly Answered

1 "correct" answer available (4 pts)
21 Replies Last post: Jan 4, 2009 5:50 AM by number6   Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next
Click to view Tech4me's profile Old Hand 1,238 posts since
Feb 6, 2008
15. Dec 31, 2008 5:13 PM in response to: Adama
Re: Adobe Reader 9

Adama. I still have IE7....and Adobe 9....Nothing wrong with that.....:p

Click to view coastie65's profile Member Moderators 9,163 posts since
Apr 2, 2007
16. Dec 31, 2008 5:20 PM in response to: Tech4me
Re: Adobe Reader 9
ME Too. http://forums.pcworld.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/8173/th_3129475f.gif


eMachines T5212.... Intel Pentium D 945 3.4Ghz..... evga 9800 GT 512 Mb PCI-E video card..... Realtec HD audio......2 Gb Crucial 667 Mhz DDR2 memory..... Lite on CD RW; DVD RW, DL,& Lightscribe optical drive...... Windows XP MCE 2005....... Antec Basiq 500w PSU......200 Gb Parallel ATA HDD.........Samsung 22" WS SyncMaster 2243BWX Monitor.
Click to view Adama's profile Veteran 6,570 posts since
Sep 7, 2007
17. Dec 31, 2008 8:24 PM in response to: coastie65
Re: Adobe Reader 9
LOL Love your emo! :D
Click to view mirone's profile New Member 80 posts since
Jul 28, 2006
18. Jan 3, 2009 7:16 PM in response to: david7
Re: Adobe Reader 9
I use AR 9 and i'm satisfied with it. Working much faster than the old one. :)


Tesla first, all the rest!
Click to view lilxkid24's profile Old Hand 1,936 posts since
Jul 8, 2007
19. Jan 3, 2009 9:56 PM in response to: mirone
Re: Adobe Reader 9
buttt foxit is much quickerrrrrr who doesn't want speed nowadays plus it takes like 95% less space than adobe


AMD Athlon 64x2 4400 2.3ghz..... 2Gigs DDR2 240-pin DIMM.....BFG Nvidia 9800 GT 512MB.....320GB Seagate HDD.....Corsair VX 450w PSU.....Dell 20" E207WFP 1680x1050 resolution.....Windows XP Pro SP3 x86.....Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Click to view piyushsingh's profile Old Hand 2,964 posts since
Jul 21, 2007
20. Jan 3, 2009 11:07 PM in response to: lilxkid24
Re: Adobe Reader 9

lilxkid24 wrote:buttt foxit is much quickerrrrrr who doesn't want speed nowadays plus it takes like 95% less space than adobe
I agree with you. Foxit reader 3.0 just shows 6.92MB in my installation list , adobe reader 9 setup itself is 33 MB , the installtion would be much more.
Click to view number6's profile Old Hand 2,239 posts since
Mar 28, 2008
21. Jan 4, 2009 5:50 AM in response to: piyushsingh
Re: Adobe Reader 9

I agree that Foxit Reader 3 is way better than Adobe Reader, but I think I'm going to downgrade to Foxit Reader 2 to get more speed and save space.


CCleaner - Freeware Windows Optimization Spreadfirefox Affiliate Button
Watch: Greed
Google Watch

Visit other IDG sites: