Quantcast
PC World
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
6 Replies Last post: Aug 15, 2007 5:28 PM by ba64  
Click to view IAmMe1's profile New Member 3 posts since
Jul 28, 2007
Reply

Jul 28, 2007 3:16 PM

A new point-and-shoot... Advice?

Hi, I'm looking into getting a new point-and-shoot camera (mine's terribly outdated and bad). I want to get one with a nice set of manual features, as I want to get into some amateur photography. I was looking at the PC World review for the Olympus C-5500 Sport Zoom, which looked wonderful. A ton of manual features (despite a lack of manual zoom) and a reasonable price made me like the camera (and the 5x zoom was a nice bonus). However, one thing turned me away: a 4.7 second shot-to-shot time, according to CNET! My current camera is really slow, which is one of the main reasons I want a new camera anyways, so it seems a bit pointless...

So, my question is, what is a comparable (and hopefully faster) camera to the C-5500 at a similar price? The C-5500 is a little more than I was hoping to spend, but I guess it's not terrible by any means. I just don't want to go much more.

Thanks.
Reply
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 3,716 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
1. Jul 28, 2007 7:22 PM in response to: IAmMe1
Point and shoot camera tend to be VERY slow in terms of time from pushing "take picture" button to actually taking picture. Commonly referred to as shutter lag. As a result, it can be tough to take pictures of small kids or sports/action with point and shoots. If you really want quick shutter reponse, then you will want to look at SLRs or higher end non-SLR cameras that function much like an SLR but cannot interchange lenses. In other words, your typical small point and shoot will not work so well.

If you are talk about time from picture being taken to full storage on the memory card and then being ready to take the next picture, then that will depend on resolutions of camera (i.e. how big the file is that it needs to save), the type of storage media (some flash memory storage card systems are faster than others), and amount of buffer the camera has (some cameras will have fast buffer memory that will allow you to take some rapid pictures in a row filling up the buffer and then saving to the flash memory "later").

It would appear that several of Canon's PowerShot cameras might compete well with this camera. My suggestion would be to go to a local store and try them out.


[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 3,716 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
3. Jul 29, 2007 12:31 AM in response to: IAmMe1
IAmMe1 wrote:Actually, just today I was at a local camera shop and tried out a couple cameras. They weren't terribly helpful, really... But I did try out the PowerShot A550. The speed was rather nice, but it seemed to lack manual controls. I glanced at the PCWorld review for the A540, however (there's no A550 review), and it seemed to have a decent number of of controls for a beginning photographer. I may have missed something on the A550... Can anyone tell me if there's a reasonable number of features? Or give me a quick review? I'd appreciate it, thanks.


I'll have to see if some store near me has the C-5500. I'd like to try it and see what the shutter lag and shot-to-shot lag are like.


Here is a review from CNET:

[url]http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/canon-powershot-a550/4505-6501_7-32314543.html_

It appears that it does not have full, traditional "manual" mode (i.e. you set shutter speed and aperture), but I could not really tell for sure. It has some sort of manual mode.

You might want to go to the Canon SureShoot A630 if you really want a traditional manual mode. I have the A610 and it will do a true, traditional manual mode. It works fine for a point and shoot camera. If you are expecting more, then you will need to look at higher end non-SLR cameras and SLR cameras. If you go with a point and shoot, then you have to accept the inherent limiitations.

I believe the Olympus C-5500 is an older model that may not be readily available. That might make it difficult to find it in stores.


[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view ba64's profile New Member 5 posts since
Dec 21, 2006
5. Aug 15, 2007 5:22 PM in response to: IAmMe1
Re: A new point-and-shoot... Advice?
IAmMe1 wrote:Olympus C-5500 Sport Zoom, ... However, one thing turned me away: a 4.7 second shot-to-shot time, according to CNET! Thanks.

Most current mid-priced an up point and shoot cameras will manage shot to shot times of 1.5 to 1.6 sec. if you're not using the flash. Using flash the shot to shot times will be controlled by the flash recharge time. General rule - the more/bigger batteries the camera has the faster the flash recycle time.
Click to view ba64's profile New Member 5 posts since
Dec 21, 2006
6. Aug 15, 2007 5:28 PM in response to: IAmMe1
smax013 wrote:Point and shoot camera tend to be VERY slow in terms of time from pushing "take picture" button to actually taking picture. Commonly referred to as shutter lag. .

Shot to shot time, which is what the originator asked about is very different from shutter lag. Most current mid-price and up P & S cameras have a shutter lag of about .1 sec if pre-focused and .2 sec including auto-focus.

If you are using auto-focus on a DSLR it won't by much if any faster than a better P&S camera. If you use manual focus and exposure then the DSLR will have a VERY fast shutter response.

Visit other IDG sites: