Jul 27, 2006 10:11 PM
No, not very happy at all!
I'm all for vigorous efforts to better serve an organization's community, but my experience tonight has been quite upsetting!
I just bought a new digital camera and my motivation for visiting pcworld.com was to become better informed about the impacts of the various write speeds available in SD cards before purchasing one.
I did a search on SD speed and the most relevant listing was a column called "full disclosure," from 2 years ago, in which the author noted that there are no real standards, litttle information on manufacturers' web sites and few resources to help in selecting higher-speed cards. I wanted to respond and ask whether things had gotten any better, since my new camera supposedly has extended capabilities with faster SD cards.
First, there is no response box or forum link for the column.
Next, when I searched fof "full disclosure" in the forum search box, there's no relevant response. "Full Disclosure" is no longer an applicable concept in the PC World realm.
And third and WORST, the only way I can give any feedback is to reveal personally identiying information during the registration process, which means choosing between making valid commentatary or preserving my privacy!!!!
Frankly, that suck!!!
Not only has PC World.com shown that there's a pretty big gap in its atlas of the digital planet, it forces its users into a situation it challenges in all its coverage of issues of digital privacy!
No, not happy at all!!!