Quantcast
PC World
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
19 Replies Last post: Nov 25, 2007 7:44 PM by smax013   Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next
Click to view rgreen4's profile Old Hand 3,442 posts since
Oct 22, 2006
15. Nov 18, 2007 5:25 AM in response to: smax013
Re: Darn iMac Copycats!

I will agree about the industry standard. That forced me to Office 2000 from WordPerfect and Lotus 1-2-3. As a word processor, I far preferred WordPerfect with its flexibility and user logical menus and the one feature Word has never provided - Text Art. Very useful if you were putting out a newletter for a small group.

Alas, recognizing that the future was upon us when I installed my Vista upgrade on my Media Center, I ordered Office 2007 Home and Student, and installed it. At first I absolutely hated the "ribbon" as I couldn't find anything. I am a very heavy Excel user, and for an old time number bunny, it was a shock. A few times, I would stop, save the file, fire up my XP machine with Office 2000, open the file and finish. But, now, its almost always 100% Office 2007.

Of course it would have been faster if I didn't have to keep dropping back to Office 2000 at work.

What is the comment about Office 2008? While they may do updates to 2007, may even add features we can't do without, they likely won't change the name, and a complete rewrite any major version change is definitely not in the cards. The only thing I can think of that will have the year 2008 appended is Windows Server 2008 and their Accounting software, and Office on the Mac. Looking back at major revisions '97, 2000, 2003, 2007 - no 1 year cycles. I left out Office XP, as all it did was add activation to 2000.


Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 3,608 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
16. Nov 18, 2007 7:46 AM in response to: rgreen4
Re: Darn iMac Copycats!
rgreen4 wrote:

What is the comment about Office 2008? While they may do updates to 2007, may even add features we can't do without, they likely won't change the name, and a complete rewrite any major version change is definitely not in the cards. The only thing I can think of that will have the year 2008 appended is Windows Server 2008 and their Accounting software, and Office on the Mac. Looking back at major revisions '97, 2000, 2003, 2007 - no 1 year cycles. I left out Office XP, as all it did was add activation to 2000.
Office 2008 is the upcoming Mac version. The currently available Mac version is Office 2004. Micro$oft will release Office 2008 for the Mac sometime shortly after the first of the year. It is LONG over due. It was supposed to be released sometime this year, but they kept pushing it back (kind of like they did with Vista and Office 2007, if I recall correctly). The biggest thing that it will bring is the ablility to run in Intel native mode, which will mean it will finally take advantage of the Intel chips that Apple now uses and run faster. It will obviously also add the new file format and I would guess goto the ribbon much like Office 2007 for Windoze.


[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]
Click to view easterwabbit's profile New Member 1 posts since
Nov 25, 2007
17. Nov 25, 2007 7:24 PM in response to: TechyGuy
Re: Darn iMac Copycats!
automobile manufacturers copy each other as well

so imac is the desktop monitor one ?

i have bene unable to figure out the dfferent mac systems and what they are exactly


Randy Lincoln IL K7 AMD slot A 650mgz jabil kadoka 4000000 series mobo ATC PCI AGP DIMM circa 1998-2004
Click to view smax013's profile Member Moderators 3,608 posts since
Jan 28, 2007
19. Nov 25, 2007 7:44 PM in response to: TechyGuy
Re: Darn iMac Copycats!
TechyGuy wrote:
If you're unsure as to what the 5 different Macs are, here goes:

iMac: a desktop integrated into the monitor/monitor integrated into the desktop, reasonable performance
Mac Mini: ultra-compact desktop, very unexpandable, somewhat pokey performance wise.
Mac Pro: High-end Desktop/Workstation(uses expensive Xeon-CPUs)
Macbook: very light-weight notebook, 13.3" screen, average notebook performance
Macbook Pro: light-weight, high-end notebook, 15" or 17" display
Somewhat depends on how you define "unexpandable". All Macs, with the exception of the Mac Pro, have limited ability to "crack" them open to expand. All Macs, with the exception of the Mac mini, can be opened up to expand memory...at least without voiding the warranty (you can crack the mini to upgrade the memory as well, but you will void the warranty). The MacBook and Mac Pro can be opened to upgrade the hard drive...the MacBook Pro, iMac, and mini can as well, but you will void the warranty.


All Macs, however, can be expanded pretty well with USB and Firewire devices (all Macs come with Firewire ports...some even come with Firewire 800 ports). Without a doubt, however, the Mac Pro is the most "PeeCee" like in that it is a tower where you can easily add cards, drives, memory, etc.


[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]

Visit other IDG sites: