No use in getting agressive, i just pointed out facts and i am well aware of the procedures. Before posting i asked questions to people who know how it works and my facts were from precise answers. I am not blasting anyone, just info i am putting out.
BTW i am far from naive and consider your comment as an unwarranted remark.
I most likely know a hell of a lot more about Canada/USA relations than you will ever learn.
Edited by MPHEnterprises - No Personal Attacks
That was not aggressive. I was merely trying to point out that it might not be as simple as you think it to be. Personally, I don't know. I was merely speculating as to why Quebec might have been excluded. Never said I was right and could in fact be way off point.
Now, if you would like me to be agressive, how about this...why not try actually reading what I said? I did not out right call you naive, but instead said:
"The point is that it is
potentially naive to just scream at/blame PCWorld."
Note that you convienently glossed over the the word "potentially". I put it in there precisely because I DON'T know it all and it could turn out that it is in fact a rather simple thing that PCWorld could have done and thus, PCWorld deserves to be blamed. But, since I did not know, I tried to state that MAYBE you were oversimplifying things and PCWorld does not deserve all the blame.
But, then since you know it all (to quote you: "I most likely know a hell of a lot more about Canada/USA relations than you will ever learn."), I will bow to your infinite wisdom.
[soapbox] Backup good...no backup bad!! [/soap box]