Re: How does the iolo suite stand amidst the others?
Yeah, I'm happy with it - but - with all that's going on today on the net, I guess there is always cause for concern. Every now-and-then, I make comparitive tests with other apps - just to be on the safe side as no application scores 100% at all times. So in fact, I still use a "layered" approach. I'm always *actively checking. And so I don't perform this on a daily or weekly basis as some do. I do an "every-now-and-then" layered check for obvious security reasons.
Not relying on other's reviews and opinions is good, I guess, however, it's useful for the layered setup - especially after making tests. I'm always actively checking other apps and suggestions. As I'm happy with iolo, it's not a reason to sit down on the issue. I'm always striving to improve and to ensure that everything goes well. Alternatively speaking, you can have a "suite" and still apply a layered approach. I have turned "nothing" down here in this thread! - I'm evaluating... wisely reviewing...
Most people figure they can apply either a "suite" or "layered" protection. Why reason like that when you can combine the two? The difference is that the *suite will do the bulk of the work and the layers will catch or filter through for added protection. As I said above, the layers in my system catch some things but not a lot because the *suite does the greater part of the job. And yet, I still find the layered approach useful. From what I have observed, when people solely focus on layers, yes, they find things and yes, they find more things because there is no suite applied. At least, I think that the combination of the two brings better results - as per my tests. I really see a difference this way... ofcourse, anyone can disagree - that's OK. But that's where it stands for me. I combine the operations and see results. That's my experience. So instead of saying:
suite OR layers, I'd rather say: suite + layers.