Quantcast
PC World
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
30 Replies Last post: Jan 26, 2008 5:32 PM by BarryBoyer   1 2 3 Previous Next
Click to view PCWorld's profile PCW News Bot 18,926 posts since
Aug 1, 2007
Reply

Dec 1, 2007 10:40 PM

All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested

Post your comments for All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested here
Reply
Click to view chowyunpat's profile New Member 1 posts since
Dec 2, 2007
1. Dec 2, 2007 9:16 AM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I was expecting a longer article and a quick comparsion chart so I wouldn't have to click on each individual link.
Click to view melvinslane's profile New Member 5 posts since
Aug 4, 2006
2. Dec 3, 2007 1:48 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
This piece meal review makes it really hard to compare the ratings, good points & bad points, etc of all the suites. With a little more work this might have been useful. As is, it's nearly useless because you have to click on each suite individually !

MBS
Click to view CrimsonFox's profile New Member 6 posts since
Nov 11, 2007
3. Dec 4, 2007 11:18 AM in response to: PCWorld
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I agree with the previous posters. A quick reference chart would have gone a long way in making this article a little more useful.
Click to view melvinslane's profile New Member 5 posts since
Aug 4, 2006
4. Dec 4, 2007 1:07 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
The other thing that was not covered by this review is probably the most important thing for a lot of users who don't have the newest computers, and that's the degree to which these programs hog your computer's resources. Nortom/Symantec is probably the absolute worst case for that.
Click to view Car54's profile Member 366 posts since
Nov 16, 2006
5. Dec 4, 2007 3:15 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I do agree that a comparison chart of some kind would've been nice. I did like the user review tab to check out peoples feed back on these Suites. I would like to see more security software reviews here at PCWorld than they do, as vendors, on some of the products, put out updates and revisions a couple times a year.


Happy user of Vista, XP, Firefox, IE7, of paid for, and free security software. I’m an equal opportunity user, lol
Click to view zhorgon's profile New Member 1 posts since
Dec 4, 2007
6. Dec 4, 2007 9:38 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
More boat-anchor-ware. See this article to see why these suites make your PC perform like a 3 year old system. http://www.thepcspy.com/read/what_really_slows_windows_down/5. You are better off with a simple virus checker.
Click to view AlanStafford's profile PCW Editorial 36 posts since
Aug 14, 2006
7. Dec 5, 2007 7:58 AM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
For a comparison chart, please click on the link in the article that says "Check out our ranked chart of all eight security suites tested for this article," then click on each product's test report, or click the boxes next to each product and then click the "Compare" button.
Click to view SpiritWind's profile Enthusiast 1,153 posts since
Aug 19, 2006
8. Dec 5, 2007 10:08 AM in response to: AlanStafford
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested

:D Hi all :


Best to AVOID ALL Security "Suite(s)" and use the "Layered" Approach to Security, which is finding

a very good program in EACH Malware-fighting category . For fighting rootkits, definitely need a

program that SPECIALIZES in that "category" . Would encourage all to READ the "Document" I

created in this Forum's "Security" Section at http://forums.pcworld.com/docs/DOC-1141 .


For the BEST in what COUNTS in LIFE : http://www.tacf.org
Click to view ChuckEtheridge's profile New Member 36 posts since
Oct 8, 2007
9. Dec 5, 2007 2:32 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I was disappointed to not see Windows Live OneCare represented. I have been using that and Defender for six months on an XPsp2 system, and with my current Vista Ultimate since April of this year. Both seem to be quite competent and I have had no trouble with viruses or malware while using them. I previously had McAfee on the XP machine and found that it slowed the overall operation very unacceptably. WLOC and Defender do not seem to slow either the XP machine which was an HP in its dotage, or the FX530XV Gateway which is admittedly well equipped and has 4gb RAM, with vista Ultimate. Both programs run very quietly in the background and so far are doing a very good job of protection as they are supposed to do.
Click to view dave404's profile New Member 1 posts since
Dec 5, 2007
10. Dec 5, 2007 3:47 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I like the ZoneAlarm Firewall but when I needed anti-virus I chose McAfee suite. When you try to install McAfee it complains about the ZoneAlarm product and will not install, you have to remove ZoneAlarm and use their firewall - which defaults to all programs have internet access. Sure enough I had some nice installed programs sharing my computer. I miss ZoneAlarm asking me if its allowed - not for Firefox warnings (duh of course allow), but to stop these bots from taking over. McAfee seems to deliberately want you to remove ZoneAlarm and use their crappy firewall. I am looking for alternatives to McAfee since I am at the renewal period.
Click to view Car54's profile Member 366 posts since
Nov 16, 2006
11. Dec 5, 2007 8:04 PM in response to: AlanStafford
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
AlanStafford wrote:For a comparison chart, please click on the link in the article that says "Check out our ranked chart of all eight security suites tested for this article," then click on each product's test report, or click the boxes next to each product and then click the "Compare" button.
Oops, I just realized that tonight, thanks for that heads up. Comparison link.


Happy user of Vista, XP, Firefox, IE7, of paid for, and free security software. I’m an equal opportunity user, lol
Click to view sophyra's profile New Member 1 posts since
Dec 10, 2007
12. Dec 10, 2007 2:16 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I have been using Avast, a security suite that is free to those n\who are not employed. It serves all of my needs for security
Click to view Holmes7's profile New Member 3 posts since
Dec 11, 2007
13. Dec 11, 2007 12:05 PM in response to: PCWorld
All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
GREAT ARTICLE! When I read your article "Virus Stoppers" in your June 2007 magazine, I was very disappointed not to have found an article reviewing full security suites. This article fills that gap. My computer came pre-loaded with Trend Micro full version and am pleased with it. There was one incident of a false positive a few months ago. They offer tech support by E mail which is a plus even though I had to ask my question a couple different ways to be understood. The bottom line, in 11 months of use have had no malware infections of any sort on the computer and in today's high risk environment this seems like as much as one could hope for. When my trial period is up I think I may just keep Trend Micro.
Click to view nevertooamazed's profile New Member 34 posts since
Oct 30, 2007
14. Dec 11, 2007 3:21 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: All-in-One Security Suites: Tried and Tested
I agree with Holmes7 about Trend Micro's PC-Cillin. I've tried practically all the security suites out there, with dismal results...until I loaded PC-Cillin. It doesn't slow my Vista system down signifcantly (certainly not like Norton and Kaspersky did). Norton drove me nuts with the slowness factor and occasional queries on what I would allow onto the 'net. Kaspersky was awful, crashing my Vista system and occasionally freezing my XP system, much less constant queries on allowing programs (even Window's update inquiries) online...I got rid of this PC-World-highly-rated albatross ASAP, you can bet. I've used McAfee for years but the latest editions slowed my computers down tremendously. Even though PC World doesn't care much for Trend Micro's PC-Cillin, I think it's the best of the security suite bunch...so far. I am disappointed in PC World lately because I tried two security products highly recommended by PC World, only to have to dump both (Kaspersky Security Suite and Spyware Doctor) because they were incompatible with Vista (even though they were the latest versions that were advertised to work with Vista) and didn't "gell well" with XP, either.

Visit other IDG sites: