You really expect us to take your "publication" seriously? Just old recycled jokes, that would rather "pick" on the big-bad-Microsoft because it's "hip" than actually report truthful facts.

I haven't seen any posts about the reports showing Vista SP1 is faster than XP. Where are your posts showing the reports that prove how secure Vista is? Where are your posts on the reports that show the Vista adoption rate for both consumers and businesses is higher than XP's in the same time frame? Where are they? They are out there, and they are supported with truthful facts. A good publication would be posting that for the sake of the consumers rather than utter drivel such as this.

You really need to take a close look at what's getting reported here as well as the agenda behind it. Your goals should be to help the READERS! Not to get hits, bash Microsoft because we "can" or whatever the reason may be.

Helpful, truthful facts... that's all we want. That's all you should post.