Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
32 Replies Last post: Sep 15, 2008 7:53 AM by regisb50   Branched to a new thread. 1 2 3 Previous Next
Click to view PCWorld's profile PCW News Bot 35,855 posts since
Aug 1, 2007
Reply

Jul 13, 2008 6:58 PM

3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals

Post your comments for 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals here
Reply
Click to view hardmanb's profile New Member 9 posts since
Jul 20, 2007
1. Jul 13, 2008 8:23 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
At last someone has answered the question that everyone wanted (and needed) to know, instead of all the obligatory one-sided complaints about anything connected with the iPhone.

Yep, the iPhone battery life is just terrible...but better than all the others.
Click to view ekrub's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 13, 2008
2. Jul 13, 2008 8:50 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
Sure. But which of the phones have a replaceable battery and/or the option for a stronger battery. With my Treo, I could opt for a stronger battery and take a spare when I traveled. I love my iPhone and (now) iPhone 3G. I'll just have to keep a portable charger in my bag.

We can only hope that Steve Jobs is using an iPhone 3G as his personal cell phone; that's our best chance of seeing a replaceable battery in next round of iPhones.
Click to view chabig's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
3. Jul 14, 2008 5:46 AM in response to: ekrub
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
All of the iPhones have the ability to connect to an external battery, a charger, or any computer with a USB port. You only need a cable. Does your Treo charge from any USB port? And carrying a cable in your bag is no harder than carrying an extra battery.

I don't think you'll ever see a replaceable battery in an iPod or iPhone. It would make the device too big and it would reduce the battery life--that's right, battery life is worse with a removable battery because the battery has to be smaller. However, you can be sure that Apple will continue to push the chip makers for lower power chips.
Click to view pfhat's profile New Member 7 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
4. Jul 14, 2008 9:40 AM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals

The complete ommision of blackberrys make the conclusion that the 3G iPhone is better than all it's rivals entirely invalid and unproven.
Click to view vaibhav92's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
5. Jul 14, 2008 10:18 AM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
My nokia lasts days on a 3g network with normal usage. I think the artical writer is one of the apple fanboys who is trying to do selective distortion of facts to prove the point that "Looks you guys should be oblidged to steve for such a terrible battery life"... ha ha ha
Click to view yardena's profile PCW Editorial 31 posts since
Jul 27, 2006
6. Jul 14, 2008 10:29 AM in response to: pfhat
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals

I will be happy to include battery life for a 3G BlackBerry when we get one. The Bold isn't out yet.

Yardena Arar, Senior Editor


Yardena Arar Senior Editor, PC World
Click to view pfhat's profile New Member 7 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
7. Jul 14, 2008 10:31 AM in response to: yardena
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
What about the 3G blackberry's currently on the market? ie. 8800 series. I know my 8830 with verizon is EV-DO.
Click to view ITGuy1's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
8. Jul 14, 2008 10:52 AM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
"The good news for AT&T and other HSDPA/UMTS customers is that they can make voice calls while using their phones for data (that is, tasks such as browsing the Web or reading e-mail); Sprint and Verizon users cannot simultaneously do both."

You would be wrong...I have an LG Voyager from Verizon, and can indeed make & receive voice calls while connected to the 3G network.
Click to view jkung's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
9. Jul 14, 2008 11:00 AM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
Does this mean that I might get BETTER voice coverage with a new iPhone than with my current AT&T GSM phone? (if the 3G coverage in my area happens to be better than the GSM coverage, which is spotty even though I live in an urban area)
Click to view RonMexicoooo's profile New Member 2 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
10. Jul 14, 2008 1:19 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
I can maybe understand leaving off the battery-friendly Nokias since there's simply not that many of them here in the US. But how in the world can you justify leaving off the EVDO Blackberries? You can't throw a rock around here without hitting somebody on Verizon with a Pearl (which is very much aimed at a similar audience as the iPhone.)

The way you have the graph cropped is also more than a little misleading. You'd think the iPhone gets 3x the battery life of the Treo judging by the chart (as many people will do.) I understand going for a headline while it's popular, but leaving off one of the most popular smartphone brands on the market (from the biggest US network) and then making a 40% gap from worst-to-'first' appear like a 200% gap is a little disingenuous. I'd expect something like that from Engadget, but not PC World.

For all my complaints, it's still nice to see the numbers for several of these phones in one spot. I would also be curious to see how the LG Dare fares here as I got to tinker with one of those this weekend. It lacks true smartphone capabilities, but for somebody just wanting a nice feature phone for email, texting, music, browsing and turn-by-turn GPS it was actually pretty nice.
Click to view scottretta's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
11. Jul 14, 2008 1:11 PM in response to: chabig
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals

You are a little out of touch. The iPhone 3G does have a removable battery, unlike the first gen phone, but it is still not user removable.

The first gen phone had its' battery hard wired into the phone; this version has a more traditional battery. The battery in the new phone is larger than the old, so the idea that replacable batteries are smaller does not hold up.


It appreas that maybe, just maybe, they are setting this up to where you can have the battery replaced at an ATT / Apple store, rather than sending the phone back.

Click to view danstutzman's profile New Member 3 posts since
Nov 26, 2006
12. Jul 14, 2008 1:47 PM in response to: PCWorld
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals

I find it funny that you found it convenient to leave out the ENV2, the Dare, the Voyager, and the HTC Diamond... all of them have significantly better battery times than the iPhone 3g. PC Mag and CNet both recently reviewed the Dare and both confirmed over 8 hours of talk time on it.

I find your research and objectivity to be in question.

Click to view speedracer129's profile New Member 1 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
13. Jul 14, 2008 3:48 PM in response to: pfhat
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
That's because there is no 3G Blackberry to compare the iPhone with. The first 3G Blackberry will be the Blackberry Bold, coming out later this year.
Click to view pfhat's profile New Member 7 posts since
Jul 14, 2008
14. Jul 14, 2008 6:03 PM in response to: speedracer129
Re: 3G iPhone's Mediocre Battery Life Still Beats Rivals
How exactly is an EV-DO blackberry not 3G???

Visit other IDG sites: