2.
Oct 7, 2008 5:10 AM

in response to:
PCWorld
Re: Comcast's Cap May Mean Less Snooping on Your Net Browsing
Comcast is actually telling intellectual property (IP) lawyers that it accepts liability for copyright infringements by its users (customers), where only the user was held to be liable.
The telephone company (a/k/a service provider) used to claim that it could not be held liable for obscene or crank callers since it just provided the pipes and did not monitor what went through them, nor was it obligated to do so.
Now that argument goes out the window, since Comcast willingly says it will invade its users' privacy, and probably because Comcast itself may not just be in the container (pipes) business, but also because it pays for content (through subsidiaries) as well and sees IP violations as an attack on its bottom line.
This will bite Comcast in the proverbial *ss though. It will keep a database on users of sites visited, which will be hacked, and users' private info will be published on the Internet. A new set of lawyers will then fill up the law court seats.