I was looking at several of laptop reviews on this site to consider a purchase
and I had a question concerning the Lab Test section and the Worldbench
numbers.
The raw Worldbench numbers are defined as seconds. I assume that this
is the number of seconds to complete a specific task. Therefore,
higher numbers would be slower performance. However, looking at these
three reviews, the laptop with the higher raw scores was given a higher
overall performance score.
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/31948/tests/wind_nb_u100.html
Performance: Good: 72 - total score in seconds: 6790
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/34873/tests/ideapad_s10.html
Performance: Very Good: 81 - total score in seconds:
6800 (not including Roxio score as other tests did not report this
number)
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/34874/tests/aspire_one.html
Performance: Good: 72 - total score in seconds: 7160
So why did the Lenovo Ideapad S10 score higher than the MSI Wind U100?
Additionally, I have an old Sharp Actius MP30. Anyone know if there are any
comparable test results for this computer to the others mentioned above?
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/23928/tests/actius_mp30_notebook.html
I am interested in knowing whether these newer ultra-portable laptops
are actually any better than my existing Sharp MP30?